RV8 - 3.9 cam in a 3.5 - worth doing?
Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
RV8 - 3.9 cam in a 3.5 - worth doing?
I am attempting to buy a Rover V8 car, more on this if the deal goes through, and a chap I know has a brand new factory 3.9 cam for £cheap. I have read in the past that a 3.9 cam in a 3.5 makes like 15 BHP or somesuch without any loss of drivability.
Is this true? If so I think I'll blag the cam as soon as I have a confirmation on the car.
Is this true? If so I think I'll blag the cam as soon as I have a confirmation on the car.
-
- Top Dog
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK
- topcatcustom
- Forum Contributor
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
I put one in mine and it made a noticible difference, but then my original cam, was past it's best, If the cam in the engine has done some mileage then it's probably worth changing as they are usually the first thing to go.
FYI I paid just over £100 from Island 4x4 for the cam, oem followers, chain, sprockets and gaskets (inc composite valley).
FYI I paid just over £100 from Island 4x4 for the cam, oem followers, chain, sprockets and gaskets (inc composite valley).
Kevin S
- Pocket rocket
- Getting There
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:08 am
- Location: Hawkinge, Kent
I didnt notice any difference when I stuck one in my 3500?
Perry Stephenson
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
I read on a forum (ORRP i think) that the 3.9 cam pushes the torque more into the middle of the rev range so you have to "drive" it more. Not sure how true that is...
I went for a standard 3.5 EFi cam in mine as i am a lazy driver and like the torque where it should be on a landrover- down low
I went for a standard 3.5 EFi cam in mine as i am a lazy driver and like the torque where it should be on a landrover- down low

1974 Rover 3500s
1984 3.5 90
1959 2.25 series 2
1984 3.5 90
1959 2.25 series 2