RV8 - 3.9 cam in a 3.5 - worth doing?

General Chat About Engine Build

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
alistair
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:27 pm

RV8 - 3.9 cam in a 3.5 - worth doing?

Post by alistair »

I am attempting to buy a Rover V8 car, more on this if the deal goes through, and a chap I know has a brand new factory 3.9 cam for £cheap. I have read in the past that a 3.9 cam in a 3.5 makes like 15 BHP or somesuch without any loss of drivability.

Is this true? If so I think I'll blag the cam as soon as I have a confirmation on the car.


CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

Alistair,

Must have been pub talk, the actual gain is more like 4-6 BHP the 3.9 cam although having slightly better timing still has relatively low lift.

V8 tuner has them for approx £55.00

Kevin.
User avatar
topcatcustom
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2965
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by topcatcustom »

Considering all the work, new set of lifters and gaskets etc to change the cam, depending on the use you may be better buying a complete 3.9.
TC
kstrutt1
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:08 pm

Post by kstrutt1 »

I put one in mine and it made a noticible difference, but then my original cam, was past it's best, If the cam in the engine has done some mileage then it's probably worth changing as they are usually the first thing to go.

FYI I paid just over £100 from Island 4x4 for the cam, oem followers, chain, sprockets and gaskets (inc composite valley).
Kevin S
User avatar
Pocket rocket
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 256
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:08 am
Location: Hawkinge, Kent

Post by Pocket rocket »

I put one in mine - was told that it might smooth out the otherwise lumpy idle from fitting a 500 Edelbrock. Dunno how troo that was...... :?
mgbv8
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by mgbv8 »

I didnt notice any difference when I stuck one in my 3500?
Perry Stephenson
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
Quagmire
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 9:42 am
Location: Hook, UK

Post by Quagmire »

I read on a forum (ORRP i think) that the 3.9 cam pushes the torque more into the middle of the rev range so you have to "drive" it more. Not sure how true that is...

I went for a standard 3.5 EFi cam in mine as i am a lazy driver and like the torque where it should be on a landrover- down low :)
1974 Rover 3500s
1984 3.5 90
1959 2.25 series 2
badger
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 255
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:28 am
Location: Elgin, Morayshire
Contact:

Post by badger »

3.9 cam is a 3.5 cam advanced by 2 degrees, nothing else!
Anyone that says it produces more power is comparing it to a worn-out 3.5 cam. It moves the max power rpm down by around 200rpm and as a result gives the slightest touch more midrange torque, but that's it.
Badger.
"Real sport has 8 spark plugs"
www.roverv8engines.co.uk
alistair
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:27 pm

Post by alistair »

cheers for the replies.
Post Reply

Return to “Engines Area”