Pitted Combustion Chambers - Buick 300
Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
I think your stage 3 heads modified with 1.5'' exhaust valves is the best option as long you use an 2.8'' crank.
But something about valve seat. Three-angle jobs are effective for increasing airflow past the valve on NA engine. But in most cases cutting the valves and seats at three angles greatly reduces the width of the actual valve-seat area. But since the operating temperature of the valve is controlled by its contacts with the water cooled head and as the valve seat is the area of contact through which heat can be transferred from valve to the head, it is important to have an wide valve-seat area on forced induction engine (0.080'' for inlet and 0.100'' for exhaust) to help to control combustion chamber temperature in this area.
Also it allows an good valve-seat seal which is needed under high cylinder pressure.
But something about valve seat. Three-angle jobs are effective for increasing airflow past the valve on NA engine. But in most cases cutting the valves and seats at three angles greatly reduces the width of the actual valve-seat area. But since the operating temperature of the valve is controlled by its contacts with the water cooled head and as the valve seat is the area of contact through which heat can be transferred from valve to the head, it is important to have an wide valve-seat area on forced induction engine (0.080'' for inlet and 0.100'' for exhaust) to help to control combustion chamber temperature in this area.
Also it allows an good valve-seat seal which is needed under high cylinder pressure.
- HairbearTE
- Guru

- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Melton Mowbray
Just to touch upon the thread topic again
Here's a pic of the worst of my buick heads. In actual fact the damage looks far worse in the pic than it actually is but to find these heads with none of these sympoms is rare. I saw a good pair that a guy in preston had and I believe one of the guys on here bought them.



-
CastleMGBV8
- Top Dog

- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK
- topcatcustom
- Forum Contributor

- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
-
CastleMGBV8
- Top Dog

- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK
Tom,
You would need a flat top piston to make these heads usable, cant give you a comp ratio without knowing stroke 4.0 or 4.6 and whether high or low compression pistons.
An example with 4.0 pistons in a 4.6 engine and buick 300 heads would give a comp ratio with tin gaskets approx 8.7/1 and comps approx 8.2/1 which may be ok if blown.
If 4.0 engine a lot lower as suitable piston is a problem without going to a specialised build with chevy rod and pistons.
The final static comp ratio depends on how far the pistons are down the bores at TDC ie, deck height. I have assumed 20 thou for the figures stated but they can be quite a bit lower thsn that.
Kevin.
Is this for a supercharged engine?
You would need a flat top piston to make these heads usable, cant give you a comp ratio without knowing stroke 4.0 or 4.6 and whether high or low compression pistons.
An example with 4.0 pistons in a 4.6 engine and buick 300 heads would give a comp ratio with tin gaskets approx 8.7/1 and comps approx 8.2/1 which may be ok if blown.
If 4.0 engine a lot lower as suitable piston is a problem without going to a specialised build with chevy rod and pistons.
The final static comp ratio depends on how far the pistons are down the bores at TDC ie, deck height. I have assumed 20 thou for the figures stated but they can be quite a bit lower thsn that.
Kevin.
Is this for a supercharged engine?
- topcatcustom
- Forum Contributor

- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
