Pitted Combustion Chambers - Buick 300

General Chat About Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel Systems And Intake

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

User avatar
Wotland
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:45 am
Location: Belgium

Post by Wotland »

I think your stage 3 heads modified with 1.5'' exhaust valves is the best option as long you use an 2.8'' crank.

But something about valve seat. Three-angle jobs are effective for increasing airflow past the valve on NA engine. But in most cases cutting the valves and seats at three angles greatly reduces the width of the actual valve-seat area. But since the operating temperature of the valve is controlled by its contacts with the water cooled head and as the valve seat is the area of contact through which heat can be transferred from valve to the head, it is important to have an wide valve-seat area on forced induction engine (0.080'' for inlet and 0.100'' for exhaust) to help to control combustion chamber temperature in this area.
Also it allows an good valve-seat seal which is needed under high cylinder pressure.


chodjinn
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2284
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:55 am

Post by chodjinn »

So you're saying dont get an 3-angle valve seat job? Sound, less expense and more moeny towards making those roller rockers work :P
User avatar
HairbearTE
Guru
Guru
Posts: 870
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Melton Mowbray

Post by HairbearTE »

Just to touch upon the thread topic again :P Here's a pic of the worst of my buick heads. In actual fact the damage looks far worse in the pic than it actually is but to find these heads with none of these sympoms is rare. I saw a good pair that a guy in preston had and I believe one of the guys on here bought them.

Image
Image
CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

That would be me :)
chodjinn
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2284
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:55 am

Post by chodjinn »

The ones I've been looking at are a bit worse than that Marcus. Like you say though, 40yr old alu heads aren't gonna be perfect!
User avatar
topcatcustom
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2965
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by topcatcustom »

Sorry to pull up this thread but didnt want to start another one so similar, can someone give me an idea of what comp ratio I would have using 300 heads, with comp gaskets on a 4.0 block, and would they go on ok?

TC
CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

Tom,

You would need a flat top piston to make these heads usable, cant give you a comp ratio without knowing stroke 4.0 or 4.6 and whether high or low compression pistons.

An example with 4.0 pistons in a 4.6 engine and buick 300 heads would give a comp ratio with tin gaskets approx 8.7/1 and comps approx 8.2/1 which may be ok if blown.

If 4.0 engine a lot lower as suitable piston is a problem without going to a specialised build with chevy rod and pistons.

The final static comp ratio depends on how far the pistons are down the bores at TDC ie, deck height. I have assumed 20 thou for the figures stated but they can be quite a bit lower thsn that.

Kevin.

Is this for a supercharged engine?
User avatar
topcatcustom
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2965
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by topcatcustom »

Hi Kevin, yes is blown, it is a 4.0 block with 4.0 pistons, crank, rods etc the lot. I had a feeling it would be far too low but just looking at options for heads!

TC
Post Reply

Return to “Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel And Intake Area”