Single plane manifolds
Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
- topcatcustom
- Forum Contributor

- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
- HairbearTE
- Guru

- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Melton Mowbray
If they did it would look exactly the same as the above picture! I got mine from Wildcat, it's a Harcourt inlet with wildcat stamped on it. The other option is to wait around for a huffaker to turn up on ebay however many of them have been over ported and/or drilled for nitrous nozzles. A post by Gregg55 on here a while back included data that shows the harcourt inlet to be superior anyway.crayefish wrote:If only they made a Victor Jr. manifold for the Rover......

From what I remember, Vicotr Jrs are much taller.... they are at the extreme end of the single planes....HairbearTE wrote:If they did it would look exactly the same as the above picture! I got mine from Wildcat, it's a Harcourt inlet with wildcat stamped on it. The other option is to wait around for a huffaker to turn up on ebay however many of them have been over ported and/or drilled for nitrous nozzles. A post by Gregg55 on here a while back included data that shows the harcourt inlet to be superior anyway.crayefish wrote:If only they made a Victor Jr. manifold for the Rover......
Zander
-
CastleMGBV8
- Top Dog

- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK
- HairbearTE
- Guru

- Posts: 870
- Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:27 am
- Location: Melton Mowbray
The design of the Inlet ports in the head are the main reason the rover version isnt very tall. Making the inlet taller would create an undesirable abrupt turn in the inlet tract. Spacers are interesting and I have some to experiment with. A really tall single plane inlet is the "funnel web" that is available for the SBF. It looks like an awesome piece and by all accounts performs very well too.

I have currently the Performer manifold but I am slightly sceptical whether it has enough flow capacity past 5500 rpm. Edelbrock designed it for 3,5 litre engine with idle to 5500 range. I am running a 4,6 litre engine and shift at 6300 rpm at 1/4 mile. The peak hp at rollers is at 5600 rpm.
Now that I have the Merlins fitted the issue is more than interesting...
Now that I have the Merlins fitted the issue is more than interesting...
The size of the runners in the eddy 180 are suited to the standard ports in the RV8 heads, If your heads have bigger ports then the manifold will need to be port-matched.minorv8 wrote:I have currently the Performer manifold but I am slightly sceptical whether it has enough flow capacity past 5500 rpm. Edelbrock designed it for 3,5 litre engine with idle to 5500 range. I am running a 4,6 litre engine and shift at 6300 rpm at 1/4 mile. The peak hp at rollers is at 5600 rpm.
Now that I have the Merlins fitted the issue is more than interesting...
If your old heads had the standard size valves in them then your 4.6 was never going to be able to rev very high!
Do they make the Performer RPM for the Rover? That would shift up the power band of the manifold by about 1000. It seems to be a very popular manifold for the sbc. Also the airgap ones too as they run a bit cooler.minorv8 wrote:I have currently the Performer manifold but I am slightly sceptical whether it has enough flow capacity past 5500 rpm. Edelbrock designed it for 3,5 litre engine with idle to 5500 range. I am running a 4,6 litre engine and shift at 6300 rpm at 1/4 mile. The peak hp at rollers is at 5600 rpm.
Now that I have the Merlins fitted the issue is more than interesting...
Perhaps its possible to 'convert' a Performer to a Performer RPM.... as far as I can tell from photos, the main difference is that there is a hole in the divider between the two halfs.... hard to explain but you can see in these photos.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-7 ... mage=large
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-2101/?image=large
Kinda makes it a cross between a single and dual plane.... However the same could be achieved with an open spacer (which is cheap!).... try that first perhaps?
Zander
-
CastleMGBV8
- Top Dog

- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
- Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK
The ports and valves were bigger, the manifold was port matched. I have run with 1" spacer.The size of the runners in the eddy 180 are suited to the standard ports in the RV8 heads, If your heads have bigger ports then the manifold will need to be port-matched.
If your old heads had the standard size valves in them then your 4.6 was never going to be able to rev very high!



