Hotwire lambda question...

General Chat About Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel Systems And Intake

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
sowen
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:10 am
Location: Warwickshire

Hotwire lambda question...

Post by sowen »

I've just acquired a 3.9 intermediate engine from a '94 Discovery with the complete efi system attached. My plan is to swap the hotwire efi onto my carb'd Rover SD1, I've found a couple of 3.5 ecu's from the early Discovery if the 3.9 ecu isn't compatable with the smaller capacity, but the question I have is how important are the lambda sensors?

I have the multiplugs on the end of the looms, but not the sensors as the exhaust wasn't included. I've read about changing a resistor to change the spec of the efi from lambda with cat to without. I'm not interested in outright power, but more economy :lol: so was thinking that plumbing the lambda's back in is the way to go. Would it work fine without in the meantime?


1972 Rover 2000TC M16 turbo
1975 Land Rover OM606 diesel
1984 Rover SD1 3500 Megasquirt powered
User avatar
ChrisJC
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 5077
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Northants / Cambs
Contact:

Post by ChrisJC »

I think (but am not 100% sure), that if you omit the lambda sensors, you have to set the tune resistor accordingly. Then when you do fit the lambda sensors, all you have to do is switch the resistor over to the correct one.

I would go for the 3.5 ECU rather than the 3.9. Although the difference might be hard to detect!

Chris.
--
Series IIA 4.6 V8
R/R P38 4.6 V8
R/R L405 4.4 SDV8
sowen
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:10 am
Location: Warwickshire

Post by sowen »

Thanks, that's pretty much what I've read. What I don't know is if there's any advantages/disadvantages to going either way, apart from the cost of buying two lambda sensors?

The main plan is to go lpg, so I'll be happy if the hotwire runs well, if not at 100%. From what I've read, leaving the lambda sensors off and not changing the tune resistor sets the ecu into limp mode, which I also don't know how that effects the running/efficiency of the system?
1972 Rover 2000TC M16 turbo
1975 Land Rover OM606 diesel
1984 Rover SD1 3500 Megasquirt powered
DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

The purpose of a narrowband lambda sensor is only to control the mixture to within limits which won't damage a catalytic converter. If you're not using a cat there is nothing to be gained at sticking to stoichiometric - indeed for maximum power and economy you'd do best quite some way from this.

So what you need is an ECU etc from an engine not fitted with a cat. That assumes your engine (and injection bits) is exactly the same as that engine. Later engines after cats become the norm may have different ignition mapping or valve timing etc.
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y
sowen
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:10 am
Location: Warwickshire

Post by sowen »

Thanks for that, seems to be what I was reading, lambda's are only to protect the cat and don't really offer any advantages apart from that. Presumably the 3.5 hotwire efi would be early enough to be pre-cat so I think that would be the route to take :)
1972 Rover 2000TC M16 turbo
1975 Land Rover OM606 diesel
1984 Rover SD1 3500 Megasquirt powered
Post Reply

Return to “Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel And Intake Area”