How straight does the engine have to be?

General Chat About Engine Build

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
Crazy
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: The Asylum
Contact:

How straight does the engine have to be?

Post by Crazy »

I was just wondering how straight the 3.5 RV8 needs to be in the bay? Reason I ask is my engine in the Volvo points a bit to one side (the pulleys would have to be moved about 2-3 inches to the left as you look at it from the front for it to be perfectly inline with the transmission n propshaft.

It also sits a bit nose high at the moment too but didn't know if this was an issue or not.


The engine is all bolted up to the gearbox which is all bolted up to the propshaft.


The tail end of the gearbox has the usual CV joint on it so I thought that this would allow for a little bit of an angle / tilt on the engine.




Cheers


kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by kiwicar »

Hi,
in an ideal world you have a slight off set from the drive comming out the gearbox to the centre line of the drive into the back axel, on a live axel setup at static ride height, 1/4 to 1/2" is about right on a 4 foot propshaft . If you have about the same side to side then so be it but yuo can tollerate up to about 1 1/2 to 2" with the same length prop. You can also tolerate a skew of the drive lines up to about 3 degrees on a prop of about 4 feet, it is not ideal but then again not a big issue.
Best regards
Mike
poppet valves rule!
Crazy
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: The Asylum
Contact:

Post by Crazy »

Thats cool. I think I have too much skew then as the engine, from an aerial view, is at about a 10 or 15 degree angle from the propshaft. So I guess that's way too much of an angle then?

I've only ever tuned engines that were already in cars, not fitting them so didn't have experience of fitting engines like this.
unstable load
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 1279
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 6:53 am

Post by unstable load »

I recall from helping on a marine installation that about 2 degrees out of line is desirable to keep the joints working and prevent premature failure of the joints.

If you take them to bits, remember that the joints need to be out of phase to counter the losses and vibrations inherent to the system.
Cheers,
John
Crazy
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: The Asylum
Contact:

Post by Crazy »

Thats cool. This gives an idea of how out from central it is at the moment. The fag is the central mark.

Image
User avatar
ChrisJC
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 5077
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Northants / Cambs
Contact:

Post by ChrisJC »

The factory LDV V8 vans have the engine offset towards the passenger side to allow clearance of the steering box. I would think the offset is a couple of inches.

They use standard UJ's on the prop.

If you get into a problem, you can always use CV joints on the prop, then you can run at whatever angle you like.

Chris.
--
Series IIA 4.6 V8
R/R P38 4.6 V8
R/R L405 4.4 SDV8
Crazy
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: The Asylum
Contact:

Post by Crazy »

Cheers mate. Very helpful :) I gave a UJ on tge prop anyways (I call them CVs though but all the same thing)

Time to get on the engine mounts then :)
kstrutt1
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:08 pm

Post by kstrutt1 »

I had to offset the engine on my TR7V8 to one side by about 15mm to allow me to use SD1 exhaust manifolds,. I used a combination of mounting the engine at a angle and translating it sideways, It seems to work fine.

Kevin
Kevin S
Crazy
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: The Asylum
Contact:

Post by Crazy »

Cheers guys. I managed to get it a bit straighter, so I'm now onto the mounting stage. Well, my mate is for me LOL
DEVONMAN
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 1440
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:46 pm
Location: Croydon UK

Post by DEVONMAN »

As ChrisJC said, if you have CV joints at each end of the prop then you should be ok. The engine looks like an SD1, so if you have the standard gearbox (LT77) and prop, it will have CV joints and not UJ's.

Ideally, when viewed from above, the angle of the prop at the gearbox should be the same as the angle of the prop at the axle flange.
Ditto when looked at from the side. However, if you use CV joints then the errors will be acceptable. If you can move the back of the gearbox over as well then this would help to reduce the angles
With regards to the nose up situation, the RV8 engine is deigned to be installed with the nose slightly up and all the inlet manifolds are set to allow for this so as to make the carbs level.

Regards Denis
1950 A40 Devon Hotrod with 5.0 twin turbo RV8.
EDIS8 wasted spark, Holley Injection.
Been as far as the Moon and back in 57 years of driving. Same Car, 5 engine upgrades !!!


Image
Crazy
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 3:25 pm
Location: The Asylum
Contact:

Post by Crazy »

Cheers for the info. It's actually a Volvo ZF gearbox I'm using but it has tge UJ at each end of the prop rather than cvs but the 2 cvs work as a UJ so it's all good really then :)
Post Reply

Return to “Engines Area”