Which heads?
Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators
-
- Getting There
- Posts: 246
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:43 pm
- topcatcustom
- Forum Contributor
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
Dont forget if you fit intermediate heads as it sounds like you will with composites, there is a high chance you will need to have you rocker shaft pedestals or pillars skimmed to retain the correct preload on the lifters. If you retain the tin gaskets then you should be fine, but of course dont forget to check anyway.
TC
TC
- topcatcustom
- Forum Contributor
- Posts: 2965
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
- Location: Essex
- Contact:
I had the heads skimmed where the bosses actually bolt down onto the heads as according to Des Hammill this is better than skimming the pedestals. Remember that the rocker ratio will have an effect in some way. My heads were machined in order to improve the valve train geometry. I simply used adjustable pushrods to sort out the pre-load!
(Even they had to be shortened by 4mm but then again my motor had 70 thou taken off the gasket faces of each head!)
You might find that in terms of cost adjustables are not that much more expensive then getting the machining done.
I personally would not use "tins"
There was a thread running a while ago about them, many people had problems with them. In the end Rover must have realised this too as they went to 'comps' even though it ment more expense for them as they had to machine the heads more.
Then again some people reckon that they are OK!
(Even they had to be shortened by 4mm but then again my motor had 70 thou taken off the gasket faces of each head!)
You might find that in terms of cost adjustables are not that much more expensive then getting the machining done.
I personally would not use "tins"
There was a thread running a while ago about them, many people had problems with them. In the end Rover must have realised this too as they went to 'comps' even though it ment more expense for them as they had to machine the heads more.
Then again some people reckon that they are OK!
Hi
Thank you again for all you help, I hadn't realised there was so much to consider!
I only do about 1500 miles a year and and rarely rev above 4000 and that would be overtaking! I have a spare set of tin gaskets that came with the car and think I will use them, it sounds a lot easier! I think they will be ok on the Spartan, she doesn't get a lot of use and I don't abuse her, just love the sound of the V8!
I have no doubt I will be back on asking for advice on setting the pre load in October, I only tax her April to September. Just hope the tin gaskets work out ok!
Fil
Thank you again for all you help, I hadn't realised there was so much to consider!
I only do about 1500 miles a year and and rarely rev above 4000 and that would be overtaking! I have a spare set of tin gaskets that came with the car and think I will use them, it sounds a lot easier! I think they will be ok on the Spartan, she doesn't get a lot of use and I don't abuse her, just love the sound of the V8!
I have no doubt I will be back on asking for advice on setting the pre load in October, I only tax her April to September. Just hope the tin gaskets work out ok!
Fil
If it's got booby bits or tires it's going to be trouble!
What will help with tins is NOT fitting the outer head bolts, the ones near the spark plug holes.spartanv8 wrote:Hi
Thank you again for all you help, I hadn't realised there was so much to consider!
I only do about 1500 miles a year and and rarely rev above 4000 and that would be overtaking! I have a spare set of tin gaskets that came with the car and think I will use them, it sounds a lot easier! I think they will be ok on the Spartan, she doesn't get a lot of use and I don't abuse her, just love the sound of the V8!
I have no doubt I will be back on asking for advice on setting the pre load in October, I only tax her April to September. Just hope the tin gaskets work out ok!
Fil
Good luck with the rebuild
