4.6 and 3.9 standard pistons are the same????

General Chat About Engine Build

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

mgbv8
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 pm

4.6 and 3.9 standard pistons are the same????

Post by mgbv8 »

Thats right isnt it? They are both 94mm but have a different stroke to get the 3.9 up to 4.6 dont they?

I'm hjaving trouble finding a set os stock 4.6 pistons at a reasonable price.
Rimmers want 68 quid a piston??


Perry Stephenson
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
User avatar
davemgb
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 143
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:55 pm
Location: Just north of watford

Post by davemgb »

I think you will find that the 4.6 piston has the gudgion pin nearer the crown and offset to one side compared with the 3.9 or 4.0 piston.

Dave
mgbv8
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by mgbv8 »

Thanks Dave
Perry Stephenson
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
RoverP6B
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:08 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by RoverP6B »

The 4.6 also has larger gudgeon pins,...24.00mm diameter as opposed to the 3.9 which are 22.2mm.

Only the 4.0 and 4.6 have pistons which have the same size gudgeon pins, but their design are also distinct from each other.

You will need to use 4.6 litre pistons in a 4.6.

Ron.
4.6 Rover 3500 P6B
CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

Perry,

the 4.0 & 4.6 pistons are completely different to the 3.9 ones and have a larger gudgeon pin of .966 and compression height of 35.8mm as opposed to the 3.9 which has a gudgeon pin of .874 and compression height of 38.02mm plus an offset on the gudgeon of 0.6mm.

Real steel has 4.6 +20 pistons for£133.92 for a set of 8 but that would mean a rebore and I guess not what you want to do.

You give them a ring to see if they have any standard size ones or try LandRover agents, I think they are Hepworth manufacture so why not give them a ring direct.

If you want a bit more compression you could use 4.0 pistons, I don't know the bowl volume so cannot give you the actual compression ratio, I have heard 10.8/1 mentioned before but that does sound a little high to me, if you speak to Hepworth you ask them what the actual volume of the piston bowl is and we can work it out.

I think V8 Tuner has 4.6 pistons so you could try them as well.

Kevin.
TVRleigh
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by TVRleigh »

CastleMGBV8 wrote:Perry,

the 4.0 & 4.6 pistons are completely different to the 3.9 ones and have a larger gudgeon pin of .966 and compression height of 35.8mm as opposed to the 3.9 which has a gudgeon pin of .874 and compression height of 38.02mm plus an offset on the gudgeon of 0.6mm.

Real steel has 4.6 +20 pistons for£133.92 for a set of 8 but that would mean a rebore and I guess not what you want to do.

You give them a ring to see if they have any standard size ones or try LandRover agents, I think they are Hepworth manufacture so why not give them a ring direct.

If you want a bit more compression you could use 4.0 pistons, I don't know the bowl volume so cannot give you the actual compression ratio, I have heard 10.8/1 mentioned before but that does sound a little high to me, if you speak to Hepworth you ask them what the actual volume of the piston bowl is and we can work it out.

I think V8 Tuner has 4.6 pistons so you could try them as well.

Kevin.
could you skim the 4.0 piston to give 10/1 not sure how much you would need to take off. but the 4.0 piston have quite a big bowl.

Also 4.0 pistons are lighter than 4.6 ones.
Current V8 car TVR 400SE 240 BHP
Current Project TVR Tasmin Race, with 3.9 running at 230 BHP
Currently building a 4.6 300 BHP Xbolted Engine for it. Solid Lifters and Group A rockers, Stange 4 heads, Pocketed piston, fully balanced.
mgbv8
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by mgbv8 »

I've been told by Sean at V8 Devs that the 4.0 low comp pistons will be ok in my 4.6 engine. I hope so, because I've just ordered a set???
Perry Stephenson
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

Perry,

Just a thought and I hope I'm wrong, but if the 4.0 pistons are lighter as suggested by Leigh won't the engine require re-balancing?

I've just got my internals for the 4.35 engine back from Real Steel and it needed quite a bit of heavy metal to balance it with the chevy rods and pistons. Engine should be going together in the next few days at long last.

Worth checking the piston weights to be on the safe side.

Kevin.
TVRleigh
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by TVRleigh »

Any Engine that's going to be pushed should get balanced.

for the price £200-£300 it just not worth not doing it.
Current V8 car TVR 400SE 240 BHP
Current Project TVR Tasmin Race, with 3.9 running at 230 BHP
Currently building a 4.6 300 BHP Xbolted Engine for it. Solid Lifters and Group A rockers, Stange 4 heads, Pocketed piston, fully balanced.
User avatar
russell_ram
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 238
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:03 pm
Location: Midlands

Post by russell_ram »

"I've been told by Sean at V8 Devs that the 4.0 low comp pistons will be ok in my 4.6 engine"

I'm failing to understand why you would want to use 4.0 Low Comps in a 4.6 motor ? ?

Using 4.0 9.35s gives you a free CR increase compared to 4.6 pistons when used with a 4.6 crank. I haven't done the sums but surely 4.0 Low comps will end up being almost the same as 4.6HCs?

Why not take the free performance upgrade from increased CR? I have been running my 4.6 at 10.5CR with a 100 shot for 8 years with no issues at all.

Russ

Just done a quick sum and I calc an LC 4.0 piston bowl at 33cc cf a std 4.6 at 32cc. So you should end up exactly where started CR wise, just about.
Rover Powered to 11.63sec @ 128mph.
mgbv8
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by mgbv8 »

Russ
Maybe thats why he said they would be ok. So I end up about where I should do?? I think its down to the OE suppliers running short on stock.
I hope they are ok mind. I dont want another tear down too soon.

All this talk of minor differences in the 4.0 vs 4.6 pistons has me a little worried I must say. I'll call V8D again on Tuesday to confirm they will be right for my engine. It was built by V8D in the first place.

Kev
The egnine has been balanced, and I will weigh the pistons as usual. I have the correct scales. I wouldnt have thought the pistons being lighter would matter. Would it? If I make sure the pistons are all the same weight, give or take a gram, I will be ok wont I???

Perry
Perry Stephenson
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

Perry,

I'm no expert in the black art of balancing a V8, but if the pistons are lighter then I would have thought that you would need to lighten the counterweights on the 4.6 crank to match. Mine was the opposite heavier rods and pistons so weight was added to the counterweights.

I have tried to source accurate information regarding the various pistons for the RV8 to include the chamber volumes and weights, so far without success, if anyone has this information it would be useful to post it on the board and made a sticky so it is available to others for future reference.

Kevin
User avatar
Wotland
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 770
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:45 am
Location: Belgium

Post by Wotland »

Hello,
In my datas base I have :
- 9.35 4.6 pistons : 22,29cc top dish
- 9:35 4.0 pistons : 13,23cc top dish
Same comp height of 35,9mm
TVRleigh
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 343
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by TVRleigh »

Std 4.0 X-bolted block weights
pistons are 458-462g (no pin or rings)
Rods are 592-596g (with bolts but without sheels.)

I did not weigh the gudgin pins

Hope this helps.
Current V8 car TVR 400SE 240 BHP
Current Project TVR Tasmin Race, with 3.9 running at 230 BHP
Currently building a 4.6 300 BHP Xbolted Engine for it. Solid Lifters and Group A rockers, Stange 4 heads, Pocketed piston, fully balanced.
mgbv8
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5326
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by mgbv8 »

OH!! Shitty tits!!!!

I forgot to bloody ring them today because I got stuffed up with work crap...

Another day down the flippin' pan.
Perry Stephenson
MGB GT + Rover V8
9.62 @ 137.37mph
Now looking for 8 seconds with a SBC engine
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVscbPHgue0&list=UUqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eg3avnsNKrc&index=2&list=FLqIlXfSAoiZ--GyG4tfRrjw
Post Reply

Return to “Engines Area”