flywheel decision
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 9:25 am
hiya all,
So my decision to runs the GEMS for my 4.6 westfield engine has hits its first major hurdle.
Having recieved my new 4.0 manual gems flywheel that takes the standard 10.5ins clutch cover and plate.
As i will be running the LT77 and 2WD bellhousing i can only run the 9.5ins clutch plate & cover.
So my new flywheel would require re-drilling. No so much of a problem as the next maybe.
The only real problem that worries me is, when the 9.5ins clutch plate is placed on the flywheel its overhanging the inside of the flywheel surface by aboout 3.3mm all the way round.
This means that the full clutch plate surface will not be in contact with the flywheel.
Working it out this means that 1% of the friction plate would not ne used.
Otherwise its a bespoke flywheel at a heffty £350.
Advise anyone? or just carry on?
cheers
scott
So my decision to runs the GEMS for my 4.6 westfield engine has hits its first major hurdle.
Having recieved my new 4.0 manual gems flywheel that takes the standard 10.5ins clutch cover and plate.
As i will be running the LT77 and 2WD bellhousing i can only run the 9.5ins clutch plate & cover.
So my new flywheel would require re-drilling. No so much of a problem as the next maybe.
The only real problem that worries me is, when the 9.5ins clutch plate is placed on the flywheel its overhanging the inside of the flywheel surface by aboout 3.3mm all the way round.
This means that the full clutch plate surface will not be in contact with the flywheel.
Working it out this means that 1% of the friction plate would not ne used.
Otherwise its a bespoke flywheel at a heffty £350.
Advise anyone? or just carry on?
cheers
scott