Page 1 of 1

Megajolt EDIS or Dizzy

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 8:49 pm
by topcatcustom
Hi again, I have looked through the forums but struggling to find an complete answer!
My RV8 project- blown with a 100bhp shot of nos, fed by a 4bbl atop is being built on a (as much as possible) budget as I will do all the work and fabrication myself- my simple question- bearing in mind I dont like spending money on stuff if I can help it (or it is very beneficial is):
Should I stay with my ancient dizzy (maybe get a new one) or upgrade to EDIS or MJ? (don't really know the difference between them).
Would there be much of a power increase (will keep revs below 6000 to be safe) or is the only benefit at really high revs?!?!
When I was doing my mini's a while ago we could ditch the points for an electronic unit- (possible fitment or any good with the RV8?!)

Thanks!

Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 10:04 pm
by bill shurvinton
Just do it. Big fat reliable stable spark. Exactly what you need. Will start better, will run better will handle the NOS better.

Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 10:51 pm
by topcatcustom
So to go EDIS is it really just a case of- fit trigger wheel, control module & 2 coil packs? Also would I be able to wire in an Omex rev limiter with EDIS? (They only say about coil fitment)

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:17 pm
by topcatcustom
:?:

ps is edis completely fixed timing?

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:44 pm
by Lehto
No its not... it needs an ECU like megasquirt to control the timing.

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 2:51 pm
by Teesdale_landrover
here is a good guide based on the canems system which i think only does 4 cylinder but it is still relevant
http://www.canems.co.uk/pdf/ignition_manual.pdf

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 4:50 pm
by Eliot
Rev limiting with EDIS is limited to retarding back to 10' btdc - you cannot command it to drop sparks.
Works fine on my chevy, I have a hard fuel cut if the retard doesn't catch it - which has never kicked in so far.

Not sure if MJ supports a rev limiter, MS does however. Personally I would get a MS, because you always have the option of upgrading to fuel control later - plus i suspect you will get wider support for MS.

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 5:06 pm
by topcatcustom
Thanks guys, think I might just stick with a dizzy for the moment then as I am running carbs so have no need for splashing out on MS, means I have to go back to searching for a interim cover with dizzy hole tho! :cry:

Posted: Thu Oct 23, 2008 3:12 pm
by topcatcustom
2 more Q's...

Did Rover really design a whole new front cover when they went dizzyless or did they just plug the hole (ie meaning do the later serp covers have a blank which can be drilled/reamed out for a dizzy?)

and:

I havent stripped my distributor down yet but it will probably be well worn out- am I best replacing it with something like this or putting new springs etc in the old one?
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/NEW-V8-3-9-Rover- ... dZViewItem

I would like a Mallory one or something flash but to be honest I just can't afford it!