Rolling road power figures.

General Chat About Engine Build

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Rolling road power figures.

Post by DaveEFI »

My SD1 is quoted to have 190BHP. What would I expect at the rear wheels? It's a 3 speed auto.


Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y
RoverP6B
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 728
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 8:08 am
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by RoverP6B »

Hello Dave,

If i recall correctly, that power figure is the gross figure with the engine void of all ancillaries.

The P6B had a gross output of 186HP, whilst at the rear wheels running via the 3 speed auto, anywhere from 60HP to say 110HP would be expected. Mine had 93HP, so anywhere between those boundaries.

Ron.
4.6 Rover 3500 P6B
DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

IIRC, they changed the way the factory BHP figures were quoted between the P6 and SD1. IIRC, the carb SD1 was 155BHP - despite better heads etc than the P6.
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y
User avatar
Darkspeed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 913
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Shropshire
Contact:

Post by Darkspeed »

Typically the TP Vitesse although described as 190BHP seldom did better than 175BHP and more typically 168BHP at the fly - At the wheels through a slush box I would reduce that by 20% so estimate 135BHP ish on a good one.
4.5L V8 Ginetta G27
DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

So 20% is roughly the loss you'd expect at around 5000 rpm? That was the sort of ballpark I was after.
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y
r2d2hp
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 657
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:52 pm
Location: Gt Missenden

Post by r2d2hp »

Is it possible to get an accurate reading on an automatic on the rollers. I recall my friends old ford v6 auto and due to the torque converter the figures could only be used as a ref point for before and after comparisons.
User avatar
Darkspeed
Guru
Guru
Posts: 913
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 4:43 pm
Location: Shropshire
Contact:

Post by Darkspeed »

20% is very much a glass half full approach to the likely losses especially on a box that has done a few miles.

http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/cc ... tests.html
4.5L V8 Ginetta G27
JP.
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 557
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:27 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by JP. »

r2d2hp wrote:Is it possible to get an accurate reading on an automatic on the rollers. I recall my friends old ford v6 auto and due to the torque converter the figures could only be used as a ref point for before and after comparisons.
It is possible but you need the exact specs of the converter and recalculate the numbers. Below stall speed converters almost triple the torque numbers and there's where dyno math goes wrong.
Horsepower = torque x rpm : 5252. As the torque converter by its nature multiplies torque from the engine the math goes woos.

On a non lock up system about 90% is driven energy and 10 % is loss by slip of the converter itself.

In practise without true converter specs, dyno readouts above 3000 rpm on a stock converter can be "pretty" accurate. Below 3000 rpm the torque numbers are worth nothing.
'73 Ford Capri. 3.5 RV8, Magnacharger 110 Supercharger, Merlin F85 Heads, Water/Methanol Injected
'73 Ford F250, 6.7ltr V8
Building a GT40 mk2
kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by kiwicar »

Hi
"Horsepower = torque x rpm : 5252. As the torque converter by its nature multiplies torque from the engine the math goes woos. "

Or you just measure the revs at the output of the transmission as well as at the engine and do the calculation of torque times revs for the system using this revs figure to get the power output figure for the engine and transmission. Plot that against the engine revs and save yourself a whole heap of calculations and approximations, which is actually what happens on most rolling road dynos. It has it's own problems because everyone wants as big a number as possible so on the deceleration from the measured run you coast down with the throttle closed to give "losses" and calculate an engine out-put corrected figure. Fundamentally though there is nothing special about a transmission using a dyno with a converter on a rolling road.
Best regards
Mike
poppet valves rule!
stevieturbo
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Re: Rolling road power figures.

Post by stevieturbo »

DaveEFI wrote:My SD1 is quoted to have 190BHP. What would I expect at the rear wheels? It's a 3 speed auto.
Depends on the dyno, the operator, the weather, tyres...etc etc
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Re: Rolling road power figures.

Post by kiwicar »

stevieturbo wrote:
DaveEFI wrote:My SD1 is quoted to have 190BHP. What would I expect at the rear wheels? It's a 3 speed auto.
Depends on the dyno, the operator, the weather, tyres...etc etc
how many pints it is since you entered the pub :D
best regards
Mike
poppet valves rule!
DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

There's surely not that much torque converter action at 5000 odd RPM?
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y
kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by kiwicar »

Hi
non clutched converter with about 150 bhp at the input on a converter and above stall speed and allowed to "unwind" assuming the converter is intended for the power range and weight of your car it should be designed to give
8 inch converter about 5%-6.5% slip
9" inch about 4%-5.5% slip
10" converter about 3%-4% slip
For small changes in power. . . . as a rough guide,

double the power across the converter and the slip goes up by 40%

half the power the slip goes down by 40% (but don't do this calculation twice because will still slip more than half as much)

The converter on the slingshot (8 inch converter 5200 flash stall) is intended to give 10 to 12% slip as I cross the line full throttle at 7800 revs. . . . well that is what I was recommended to gear it for.
best regards
Mike
poppet valves rule!
User avatar
ged
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 668
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Location: North Wales via NZ
Contact:

Post by ged »

Also add in the fact that your engine has done 180,000 miles as I seem to remember you stating somewhere.
DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

ged wrote:Also add in the fact that your engine has done 180,000 miles as I seem to remember you stating somewhere.
Yes - it's beginning to loosen up nicely. :D However, only some bits of it have done that mileage...

It was more of a hypothetical question. Wanting to know what sort of losses there would be through the transmission.
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y
Post Reply

Return to “Engines Area”