Biggest Valves with Standard Seats

General Chat About Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel Systems And Intake

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
cammmy
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:01 pm
Location: Rayleigh, Essex

Biggest Valves with Standard Seats

Post by cammmy »

Hi Everyone. I did a search but could not narrow it far enough to find a result.

As I'm rebuilding a 3.9 with forced induction and will be having the seats 3 angle cut to the same hight. Is it worth going one further and having them machined to accept larger valves?

DW500(2) 1.630" 4.595" £5.83 x8 = £46.44
DW501(2) 1.400" 4.595" £6.44 x8 = £51.52

(2) - Stainless steel [21-4N]/tuftrided with a wafer tip

Des Hamimill says 1.625" and 1.4" are the largest that will fit on the standard seat but Real Steel seem to sized these to fit?

Will this have good results with mild port blending and the inlet matched to the head, or is more extensive work required?


stevieturbo
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by stevieturbo »

You'd be better spending the money on a light port job, than larger valves.
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
cammmy
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:01 pm
Location: Rayleigh, Essex

Post by cammmy »

I was planning on doing the port work outlined in Des Hammill's book i.e. tidying and improving the throat areas and blending into the seats but without going overboard or enlarging the ports.

Will that not be enough to make use of larger valves when supercharged?
sidecar
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2399
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:52 pm

Re: Biggest Valves with Standard Seats

Post by sidecar »

cammmy wrote:Hi Everyone. I did a search but could not narrow it far enough to find a result.

As I'm rebuilding a 3.9 with forced induction and will be having the seats 3 angle cut to the same hight. Is it worth going one further and having them machined to accept larger valves?

DW500(2) 1.630" 4.595" £5.83 x8 = £46.44
DW501(2) 1.400" 4.595" £6.44 x8 = £51.52

(2) - Stainless steel [21-4N]/tuftrided with a wafer tip

Des Hamimill says 1.625" and 1.4" are the largest that will fit on the standard seat but Real Steel seem to sized these to fit?

Will this have good results with mild port blending and the inlet matched to the head, or is more extensive work required?

The DW valves do fit, V8 Developments fit them to their stage III heads.
stevieturbo
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 4054
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by stevieturbo »

If you're doing that anyway, then larger valves will be fine. Was just talking more from a cost point of view. Port shape, especially the throat area is where most gains will be. Not so much valve size. Even better shape standard size valves would be good. Don't go so big the valves end up shrouded, or there is little valve seat left
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0
cammmy
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:01 pm
Location: Rayleigh, Essex

Post by cammmy »

Cool. Yeah I'm planning to improve the ports anyway. Not going to go overboard with the valves but figure it may be a worthwile thing to do. Less than £100 for the valves and I'm having new guides fitted and the seats cut anyway, figure it would be worthwhile to add these at the same time.
Flying Phil
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:56 am
Location: Bedfordshire

Post by Flying Phil »

Years ago I fitted larger valves and had the valve seats and throats bored larger to suit. However I was also using a solid lifter cam and stronger valve springs - when I was racing the seat inserts started to pound into the head casting and soon the valves would not seat and leaked.......
Flying Phil
cammmy
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:01 pm
Location: Rayleigh, Essex

Post by cammmy »

I won't be seeing above 6k rpm. I do have aftermarket springs but they are the real steel ones for their blower cam (hydraulic) and I don't think the spring rate is that high.

Do you think this would still be an issue when not racing?
Flying Phil
Helpful or Confused
Helpful or Confused
Posts: 83
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2010 3:56 am
Location: Bedfordshire

Post by Flying Phil »

sorry for delayed reply - but if you are using a hydraulic cam it should be "kinder" to the valve seats and so should be ok.
Flying Phil
cammmy
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 188
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:01 pm
Location: Rayleigh, Essex

Post by cammmy »

Cool, thanks
Post Reply

Return to “Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel And Intake Area”