Thick gasket on RV8

General Chat About Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel Systems And Intake

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
sam russell
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:49 pm

Thick gasket on RV8

Post by sam russell »

I am replacing the tin gasket with a thick gasket. How much should I get skimmed off to keep the compression standard (9.25:1) ?

The engine is a 3.9 l Range Rover (1990) vintage.

Thanks.


sidecar
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2399
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:52 pm

Re: Thick gasket on RV8

Post by sidecar »

sam russell wrote:I am replacing the tin gasket with a thick gasket. How much should I get skimmed off to keep the compression standard (9.25:1) ?

The engine is a 3.9 l Range Rover (1990) vintage.

Thanks.
It depends on which thick head gaskets you have gone for, some are slightly thicker than others.

20-30 thou would be OK and you should not have to mess about with lifter pre-load or a inlet manifold skim as the heads will be in the same place.

Also I'd ditch the stretch bolts and go for normal SD1 jobbies. (you can't re-use stretch bolts anyway. There are some cheap dodgy ones on ebay)

Pete
sam russell
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:49 pm

Post by sam russell »

I was going with 20 thou, would 30 thou increase the compression ratio much?
sidecar
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2399
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:52 pm

Post by sidecar »

sam russell wrote:I was going with 20 thou, would 30 thou increase the compression ratio much?
It would not increase it much by going to 30 thou, it might not increase it at all if the new gaskets are quite thick. At the end of the day 9.25:1 is pretty low anyway, if it ended a fraction higher is would not make any odds to the power or the fuel that you would have to use.

My heads (36cc chambers) have had 70 thou taken off them to get the CR to 10:1 on my 4.6 lump. :D

If you really, really wanted to keep it EXACTLY the same you would have to "mic" up the gaskets and somehow account for the fact that the new gaskets will compress, you then have to work it out using maths.

Pete
sam russell
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:49 pm

Post by sam russell »

OK, I think I will go with 30 thou, as a small increase in compression will not hurt, and will give a better performance - even if slight.

The reason for going with composite is that there are clear signs of head gasket leak out at the ends of both heads. Thanks for the replies.
katanaman
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3081
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 7:29 pm
Location: Edinburgh
Contact:

Post by katanaman »

When LR did the interim engine and used they comp gasket on the older heads they skimmed an extra 40 thou off to keep the compression the same. When they went to do the full cross bolt engines they redid the casting which was again 40 thou less. I guess this is the result of the of the chamber being a bowl so as you skim you get diminishing returns.
plastic orange
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:23 pm
Location: Broughty Ferry
Contact:

Post by plastic orange »

Real Steel told me to skim 20 thou to retain the same comp ratio. I went for 25thou, and all seems fine.

Pete
Image Image
sam russell
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 4:49 pm

Post by sam russell »

Thanks for all the answers, it appears a bit more flexible than I thought. Anything from 20 to 40 thou. So 30 thou it is. I'll let you know when I have it up and running.
CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

Sam,

With Real Steel gaskets for the 3.9 the tin is 18 thou. compressed and the composite is 46 thou. so a difference of 28thou, a 30 thou skim will be fine and maintain lifter preload approx as before.

Kevin.
Post Reply

Return to “Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel And Intake Area”