breathing and cylinder heads for a 5L

General Chat About Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel Systems And Intake

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
ppyvabw
Guru
Guru
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm
Location: Newbury

breathing and cylinder heads for a 5L

Post by ppyvabw »

I am going to be putting the real steel 5L stroker conversion in a 3.9.

I'm just thinking about corresponding mods to my cylinder heads. I want to do the porting work myself tbh because I won't be able to afford the stroker kit and the heads :lol: Idealy I'd like the Merlin heads or the Wildcat heads :lol:

Because it's the 3.9 bore, large valves are shrouded by the cylinder walls. I was going to put the stage 2 valves in which don't need the seats changing before I decided to go to 5 Litres. Should I go to the expense of even bigger valves with a 5L despite the shrouding problem?

I'm using larger trumpets anyway on the manifold. Im currently making a custom trumpet base, so I will port the manifold correspondingly etc..I will also be making a twin plenum jobba somehow.

What other things do I need to consider when modding heads for a large capacity conversion? Just lots and lots of porting and polishing work? I know really head modding is a specialist job but I don't have the dosh in my budget to do both the 5l conversion and the heads.


kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by kiwicar »

hate to say this, but you will get more power and better drivability for your money if you forget the 5 litre kit and spend the money on either of the sets of heads you mention, a 5 l kit on any rover ported head casting will have a narrower power band. Also it will be less reliable than a 3.9 with decent heads.
Mike
poppet valves rule!
User avatar
bones
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1551
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:08 am
Location: essex

Post by bones »

ive had 1.630" inlet and 1.400 exhaust valves fitted and it didnt need the seats changing, mine were just re-cut and a 3 angle cut in. :) rich
Nightbreed racing, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJoUTZ8UUps
ppyvabw
Guru
Guru
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm
Location: Newbury

Post by ppyvabw »

kiwicar wrote:hate to say this, but you will get more power and better drivability for your money if you forget the 5 litre kit and spend the money on either of the sets of heads you mention, a 5 l kit on any rover ported head casting will have a narrower power band. Also it will be less reliable than a 3.9 with decent heads.
Mike
~Cries~ I want the five Litres, it's good pub ammo :lol:

Maybe I'll get a mortgage and get the heads too. I'm under the impression the wildcat ones are better? Do the standard rover inlet manifolds fit them? I know they fit the Merlin ones.
chodjinn
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2284
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:55 am

Post by chodjinn »

widlcat ahve their own manifolds. If you're gonna spend that amount of money on heads it'd just be rude to put a standard manifold on lol.
User avatar
HairbearTE
Guru
Guru
Posts: 870
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 12:27 am
Location: Melton Mowbray

Post by HairbearTE »

I don't know if RS Merlin are back in stock yet but if the are you should definately go that way. Wildcat heads will cost you a lot in associated parts whilst the Merlins accept standard rocker gear and inlet manifolds. The Valve size issue is a problem. You only need to take a look at the valve sizes on a built U.S. small block ford or chevy of 5 litres to realise we're banging our heads against the wall here. I recently saw an RV8 advertised on ebay with a big mechanical cam and stage 4 heads that was proudly claimed to have made peak horsepower at 5200 rpm! That tells you all you need to know about feeding 5 litres through a pair of rover heads..
Image
ppyvabw
Guru
Guru
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm
Location: Newbury

Post by ppyvabw »

Maybe I'll go with the 5 lite conversion and put some dustbin lids in for valves on standard rover heads, do some porting myself and run the engine like that for a while and save up for some nice shiny merlin heads and sell the others to cover part of the cost.
kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by kiwicar »

If you want 5 litres (for braging rights in the pub) but have an engine that will make real usable power and do it for far less money, build a ford 302 with ally heads, It will probably weigh only 20lb more. Or the old Lsx 5.3 litre chestnut...
Mike
poppet valves rule!
CastleMGBV8
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 2334
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:09 pm
Location: Sidcup, Kent, UK

Post by CastleMGBV8 »

And have you worked out what a 5.0L engine with all the right bits to make it work will cost you. What sort of budget you looking at?

Don't forget that even if you buy a stroker kit there a re-bore, block machining for crank clearance, decking to get the compression heights correct and the whole thing will need re-balancing so add anther £225 if heavy metal is required, it all adds up, I know because I've just done it and the engine went quite a bit over budget.

If youv'e got funds now there are a couple of intersting engines on e-bay at the moment, one 5.0 and a well built tophatted 4.6 that look like they might go cheap just before xmas.

Kevin.
chodjinn
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2284
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:55 am

Post by chodjinn »

Well the "TVR" 5litre is already at £1500 surprise surprise, prob go for more than that. I wouldn't touch it.

The 4.6 is far better value for money given it's almost a turnkey engine bar the ancillaries and it's been top-hat linered, and it's only £300 more . . .
ppyvabw
Guru
Guru
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 5:10 pm
Location: Newbury

Post by ppyvabw »

What's the maximum valve lift I can have with the Merlin heads using standard 3.9 hc cast pistons but with a bit machined off the heads and block to get the compression up a bit more? The valves are less inclined aren't they so you can get more lift? If, as kiwicar suggests i'll get more power with the 3.9 on proper heads, I may do that.

My whole reasoning for going to 5 litres is I want to get the compression up and run lots of cam for the novelty value and I wanted some nice forged pistons. By the time I have bought forged pistons, appropriate rods im paying over a grand anyway so I may aswell get the kit for 1600.
Boosted LS1
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 518
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 12:05 am
Location: Nottingham, Notts, England, UK
Contact:

Post by Boosted LS1 »

You could fit one or two turbo's onto a relatively standard rover and still see off a 5.0 engine in the power and torque stakes. You still get to keep those bragging rights.
Image
poo slinger
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 246
Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:43 pm

Post by poo slinger »

or if u want pub ammo get some of those 5.0 badges for your rocker covers. :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Exhaust, Cylinder Heads, Fuel And Intake Area”