Flying 1/2 mile

Day To Day Chat Area, So Forum Topic's Don't Get Spammed Up.

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

User avatar
Ian Anderson
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2396
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Edinburgh

Post by Ian Anderson »

Mike

Are you trying to challenge these guys?


http://www.bloodhoundssc.com/



Ian


Owner of an "On the Road" GT40 Replica by DAX powered by 3.9Hotwre Efi, worked over by DJ Motors. EFi Working but still does some kangaroo at low revs (Damn the speed limits) In to paint shop 18/03/08.

kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by kiwicar »

Hi Ian
no It is more to do with the way the smaller (capacity) stream liners look and the challenge of the design. To get any car to it's maximum speed is a difficult balancing act of engine power, power band width and transmission, a stream liner is even more so. Your average motorcycle 600 is designed to produce around 120bhp, run from about 15 mph in traffic and accelerate to about 140, 150 mph, with 6 gears. Stick that engine in a stream liner and it will need to make more like 150bhp probably get a push to 30mph then accelerate to 240mph, a narrower power band but twice produced further up the rev range but having to power the vehicle to 100mph more. adding gears is all very well, but a constant mesh 8 or 9 speed box will have relatively large parasitic losses, concatenate two gearboxes together maybe one of them a sun and planet box would work but then changing gear could get complex. Do you gain by making less power over a wider rev range but use fewer gears or just go all out for power and have lots of gears (maybe with a clutched torque converter?? )
best regards
Mike
poppet valves rule!

User avatar
topcatcustom
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 2965
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:53 am
Location: Essex
Contact:

Post by topcatcustom »

Surely best for narrow power band Mike with a hefty push to 40-50 ish? A torque converter of any type is surely going to result in losses especially at speed, less is more for overcoming friction, some simple motorcycle box which is renowned for low losses must be best?
TC

kev_the_mole
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:41 pm
Location: Las Islas Purbequias

Post by kev_the_mole »

So something like this then?

Image

As they say on Blue Peter "Here's one I finished** earlier" :lol:

**Belt drives only :shock:
Image


It's an engine Jim.....but not as we know it ;)

kiwicar
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 5461
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Milton Keynes

Post by kiwicar »

OK
an interesting thing to find in the back of the garage . . . it seems someone has put the cylinder head on backwards on that one! just belts, like on a Daff I would think it can give you a good wide range of ratios to use but a risk of slipping at high speed, I also like the simplicity of it as a way of doing things.
Defiantly an interesting approach, low drag gearbox. . . I am thinking 4 wheels though and fully enclosed, oh and use something more modern to power it.
best regards
Mike
poppet valves rule!

kev_the_mole
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 1022
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:41 pm
Location: Las Islas Purbequias

Post by kev_the_mole »

Not power sapping Daf variable speed belts but serious positive drive belts for the primary drive and the supercharger.

I could see if this is still available :D

Image

It's another one I did earlier
Image


It's an engine Jim.....but not as we know it ;)

stevieturbo
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 3979
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by stevieturbo »

Although must say....Ive just noticed "flying" 1/2 mile

Any of the events I mentioned via Straightliners are all standing distance events.

Not even sure if there is anywhere in the UK that could accommodate a flying event ?

ie, the longest runways here are only 2 miles or so in the first place.
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0

JP.
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 557
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:27 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Post by JP. »

You might want to watch this first..



El Mirage, november 2013
'73 Ford Capri. 3.5 RV8, Magnacharger 110 Supercharger, Merlin F85 Heads, Water/Methanol Injected
'73 Ford F250, 6.7ltr V8
Building a GT40 mk2

stevieturbo
Forum Contributor
Forum Contributor
Posts: 3979
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:22 pm
Location: Northern Ireland

Post by stevieturbo »

Racing on surfaces like that, and even the salt does seem kind of stupid though.

That really does take very specific builds.

At least racing on a solid surface, tyre grip is more or less a given.

On salt or sand etc....it isnt there to start with.
9.85 @ 144.75mph
202mph standing mile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgWRCDtiTQ0

Post Reply

Return to “General Chat Area”