Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

General Chat About Engine Build

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

Post Reply
Gasket
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by Gasket »

Hi all.

I've been looking for a specific V8 engine to rebuild for a while... a long while: my wanted ad was posted here 6-years ago.

The problem was I was looking for one of the cross-boltable 3.5L RV8s that were produced in the late '90s from the 38A castings. Referred to by Des Hammill as a "service block" and by the Lloyds boys as a military block in their books and these proved to be quite hard to find. These are effectively interim blocks that came with the undrilled crossbolting bosses, the 10-bolt heads, wider main caps, etc, except they were built with standard 3.5l 3.500"/88.9mm bores.

This weekend I finally found one and have it in my garage.

front - Copy (2).jpg
back - Copy.jpg
side - Copy (2).jpg
Its a "26Gxxxxxx" engine, stamped as 8.13:1 CR and was fitted to an auto box when found.

The engine (or at least, the block) is going into a late '60s series IIA land rover which is being built from the ground up around a nice period V8 conversion. I really want to build an interesting engine for it and to have fun in coming up with something unique, but I really don't want to get giddy with the power/torque. The drivetrain would already be on the limit at the 185lbft standard figures for a carb Range Rover Classic V8 and a standard V8 produces more (far more) than enough power for such an agricultural vehicle. So, if I can't geek out on power - why not focus on going way over the top on the actual strength of the engine and try to incorporate every conceivable update that BOP/Rover made to the engine during its 40 year life (except for the 94mm overbore). A bit of a celebration unit

Visually, I want the engine to look like a factory engine, correct to the early '70s Range Rover classics (so 'Rover' valve covers and probably Stromberg 175 carbs/inlets). I could use either SUs or Strombergs - the factory V8 prototypes used SUs, but the odd angles that Land Rovers can run at pushed them towards Strombergs in the production Range Rover.

The one exception that definitely won't look period is the timing cover and belts. I need this engine to be the shortest possible Rv8 possible - this means moving to a distributorless P38 timing cover and serpentine belts. I want to use every trick in the book to save every mm in length I can. I'll be measuring all the cooling fan options to see which is tightest to the block, I'm open to using a traditional steel fixed fan on a custom boss (I have a lathe and milling machine) or the thinnest viscous fan available. One other self-imposed limitation is that I specifically don't want to use an electric fan, as is traditional on Land Rover conversions, I want to have an engine driven fan - which should be possible thanks to the distributorless timing cover and short serp pulley.

Happy to post progress on here, but I could do with some help - the first phase of this project is outlining the plan and identifying and collecting parts.

Here is my rough list (I'm no expert, so happy to be steered-correct on any points I've misunderstood):

Machining work (will be done by one of the V8 specialists, I've already had some advice from V8Developments but happy to consider others):

1) drill to accept crossbolts
2) top hat lining (I know this sounds excessive, but I've already budgeted for it - while early 3.5s didn't suffer from liner slippage, on these late service blocks, while they don't crack and are thermally more resilient, LR changed the machining process which introduced an unrelated slippage issue)
3) Line bore the main bearing tunnel (bear in mind these service blocks have the large caps) to the larger 67.577mm P38 size
4) possibly clearance the block to accept a 4.0 crank (I'm told the P38 blocks, which share the same casting as my engine had clearance for the crank counterweights)
5) (if the threaded holes aren't there already) drill to accept a camshaft retaining plate

Parts I'd like to fit:

a) a 4.0 P38 crank. This obviously is setup for the larger main journals and has the same 71.12mm stroke as the 3.5L engine. Its nose and keyway are also ready-setup for the P38 distributorless timing cover.
b) A P38 distributorless timing cover with Serpentine belt, incorporating crank driven oil pump
c) Rover-branded valve covers from an early engine
d) SU or Stromberg carbs and inlet manifold
e) whichever cast exhaust manifolds are best routed for the installation (I won't know this until I trial it in the chassis), being a 3.5l engine I have access to the full LR/LDV/TVR/MG parts bin without risk of strangling the engine.
f) the problem. I would have wanted to use P38 type conrods and pistons (55.5mm big ends and 24mm small ends)... but these aren't compatible with 3.500" 3.5L pistons, nor do the conrod lengths work. So I think my only option is to have the 4.0 crank big end journals ground down from 55.8mm to 50.8mm and use standard 3.5L rods and pistons. Gutted about this as its the only feature I know of in which a P38 bottom end would have an edge over the little 3.5 I'm building.
g) a very thin/tight engine driven fan to keep the engine as short as possible.
h) a sump. I don't know which one yet - again I'll need to trial the engine in the chassis but I'd be looking for one that have the same clearance as the old 2.25L 4-pot engine after allowing for the longer engine. I believe that the P38 timing cover will dictate which sump(s) I cam use and suspect I'm limited to Discovery II or P38 Range Rover options).
i) some sort of distributorless ignition/trigger wheel system.
j) This engine was from an Auto, so anything I need to convert this back for a manual installation, flywheel etc.

I'm open to either tracking down parts individually or buying a donor engine or two to get the bits I need.

So, quite a long post there - but thought it would be of interest to the forum. If anyone can think of any sort of reliability/strength improvement that was incorporated into the late P38 engines that I've missed (obviously excluding EFI) then please let me know.



User avatar
ChrisJC
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 5040
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Northants / Cambs
Contact:

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by ChrisJC »

Sounds like a great project!

I've done some similar things over the years in my Landie. You seem to be well on top of your research, top marks there!

My comments:
- I went distributorless with a P38 front cover. First go was with MegaJolt + EDIS8 + Thor coilpacks + flywheel trigger (and carbs). That worked very well. Second time around I went to full Motronic which obviously covers everything! I kept the massive P38 fan, and it all fitted no bother.
- There might be a piston / rod combination from outside the Land Rover parts bin?
- Manifold wise you are going to have to stick to something from a Land Rover or Range Rover (not P38) because of the engine being offset in the chassis. I have looked at P38 and SD1 manifolds, but no good! I would say that cast manifolds are an awful lot quieter than tubular ones.
- Be careful with a steel fan if your engine is going to rev to 6000rpm !
- I copied the cooling system layout from a P38, which works very well.

Keep us posted!

Chris.
--
Series IIA 4.6 V8
R/R P38 4.6 V8
R/R L405 4.4 SDV8

SuperV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: West midlands

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by SuperV8 »

Gasket wrote:
Mon Feb 27, 2023 2:44 pm
Parts I'd like to fit:

a) a 4.0 P38 crank. This obviously is setup for the larger main journals and has the same 71.12mm stroke as the 3.5L engine. Its nose and keyway are also ready-setup for the P38 distributorless timing cover.
b) A P38 distributorless timing cover with Serpentine belt, incorporating crank driven oil pump
c) Rover-branded valve covers from an early engine
d) SU or Stromberg carbs and inlet manifold
e) whichever cast exhaust manifolds are best routed for the installation (I won't know this until I trial it in the chassis), being a 3.5l engine I have access to the full LR/LDV/TVR/MG parts bin without risk of strangling the engine.
f) the problem. I would have wanted to use P38 type conrods and pistons (55.5mm big ends and 24mm small ends)... but these aren't compatible with 3.500" 3.5L pistons, nor do the conrod lengths work. So I think my only option is to have the 4.0 crank big end journals ground down from 55.8mm to 50.8mm and use standard 3.5L rods and pistons. Gutted about this as its the only feature I know of in which a P38 bottom end would have an edge over the little 3.5 I'm building.
g) a very thin/tight engine driven fan to keep the engine as short as possible.
h) a sump. I don't know which one yet - again I'll need to trial the engine in the chassis but I'd be looking for one that have the same clearance as the old 2.25L 4-pot engine after allowing for the longer engine. I believe that the P38 timing cover will dictate which sump(s) I cam use and suspect I'm limited to Discovery II or P38 Range Rover options).
i) some sort of distributorless ignition/trigger wheel system.
j) This engine was from an Auto, so anything I need to convert this back for a manual installation, flywheel etc.

I'm open to either tracking down parts individually or buying a donor engine or two to get the bits I need.

So, quite a long post there - but thought it would be of interest to the forum. If anyone can think of any sort of reliability/strength improvement that was incorporated into the late P38 engines that I've missed (obviously excluding EFI) then please let me know.
Interesting project,
Just my two peneth!
I was looking to upgrade my supercharged 3.5 front timing cover to the later serp cover for the serp belt for my supercharger. In the end I found it cheaper to buy a whole 4.6V8 which included the front cover rather than just the front cover! Sometimes you many find individual parts having crazy prices! mind you that was a few years back and whole engines may well also be crazy prices now?

#edit# Ebay has a whole 4.0 engine for £550, but it seems 4.0/4.6 front covers are cheaper than they were with some less than £100!

The only weakness of the 4.0 was the slipped liner issues - if you're doing the top hat liner expense anyway why not just start with a 'possibly slipped liner' 4.0 and you get the cross bolting/P38 crank/pistons/rods/compact serp front cover/sump/crank pulley/water pump/tensioner for free.
The later 4.0/4.6 engines had better rotating assemblies from the factory - better internally balanced machining to a tighter tolerance with more counter weighted crank and stronger pistons.

Regarding sumps - they need to match the front cover - so you would need a 4.0/4.6 sump to go with the later serp front cover.
Cranks are the same between auto/manual - so would just bolt on flywheel and clutch.
Megasquirt is a common stand alone ECU which can manage dizy-less ignition - usually via coil packs. I made up a boss on my lathe to take a toothed trigger wheel bolted to the back of my serp crank pulley - with a simple bracket to mount the sensor.
Dax Rush 4.6 supercharged V8 MSII

Gasket
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by Gasket »

Thanks very much, both.

Glad to know I'm not crazy in pursuing this :lol:

Megasquirt was my planned route - much like the setup SuperV8 mentions, but interesting to hear that the OEM flywheel triggers might be usable - that's something I'd love to do: keeping it all enclosed. I am using a traditional Milner adaptor plate though - so appreciate that might limit my choice of flywheel (though I do have access to a machine shop and can weld aluminium, so mods are not out of the question).

On the piston/rod combo - yes I've been trying to find alternatives, while I'd be happy to use the factory 3.5 units with the ground down crank journals it would be nice to find a set that would let me keep the big ends (and ideally small ends too) at the full P38 55.5/24mm sizes. I'll keep looking in the GM aftermarket catalogues.

Thank you for the tip on the manifolds! That's a big one. I'm determined to get this combo lined up perfectly in the chassis (correctly offset to the passenger side like all other land rover installations) so that the crank nut sits in the PTO hole and the engine sits flat and parallel in relation to the chassis rails and I hadn't appreciated that the non-LR manifolds would interfere with this. That could have been a costly mistake as I'd been looking at bidding on a number of obscure car-derived manifolds to try them out. Yes, I'd like to stick with cast manifolds for both noise and period appearance.

Thanks for confirmation on the sump choice too and the tips on pricing. Looking at it, a 4.0 manual engine would give me the front cover, crank, flywheel and possibly sump too so would be a good buy. The block and heads, etc. can be sold on to recover some of the costs

Why not just use the 4.0? As per the opener really, I really want to build up a bog standard 3.5L v8 with the full wall thickness but with all the design improvements made over the years - both to build something unique and also as a bit of a celebration of the original, hence my spending 6-years tracking down a crossboltable 3.5L engine. As this came from the same casting as the 4.0 engine, the machine shop can make this block exactly the same as a 4.0/4.6 block and it can take a 4.0 crank, but without the issues introduced by the thinner cylinder walls. I'd like to find out how good/strong a BOPR215 could be with 43 years of design tweaks. I must be an oddball, but picturing sitting this 1998 3.5l RV8 on SU or Stromberg carbs next to a 1961 BOP 215 on its original Rochester is a really appealing thought. Aside from the distributorless ignition, its an engine that could have been built with the technology of the time - had the thing been born closer to perfect.
Last edited by Gasket on Wed Mar 01, 2023 7:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Gasket
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by Gasket »

ChrisJC wrote:
Tue Feb 28, 2023 6:45 pm
You seem to be well on top of your research, top marks there!
Ha ha, yep. I tried to search the forum as much as I could before posting and have devoured the following books (all highly recommended):
  • Rover V8 - the story of the engine (James Taylor)
    How to power tune rover V8 engines (Des Hammill)
    Tuning and modifying the rover V8 engine (Daniel & Nathan Lloyd)
    The step-by-step guide to Engine Blueprinting (Rick Voegelin)
I did buy a copy of Tuning Rover V8 engines by David Hardcastle, but found it less informative - its a 1998 reprint of a 1993 book and unfortunately doesn't cover anything from the crossbolted P38 era. I was a bit miffed on that point as the second edition of his "Rover V8 engine" book, which apparently did cover P38s came out in 1995 and I'd assumed a 1998 version of his tuning book would have covered them too.

If anyone has any other book recommendations, I'd be glad to add them to my Amazon list.

User avatar
ChrisJC
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 5040
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Northants / Cambs
Contact:

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by ChrisJC »

Just a note on using a flywheel as the trigger wheel - the GEMS engines had a 36-1 configuration, and Thor uses 60-1 (I think). So you have to make sure the flywheel you use is compatible with the ignition system you use.

Also, as far as I know, the flywheels are all the same size, but drilled differently depending on the size of the clutch.

In my case, I have a tuned Thor engine with flywheel with 9.5" clutch because I have a short bellhousing and R380 transmission. I couldn't fit the 10.5" clutch in the bellhousing. So I had to find a flywheel for Thor (which is rare because Thor engines were generally fitted to vehicles with automatic transmissions), then get it redrilled for the smaller clutch. However I did find two suppliers who will make flywheels from scratch, for a reasonable price, so that might be easier if you get into a challenge in that area.

Chris.
--
Series IIA 4.6 V8
R/R P38 4.6 V8
R/R L405 4.4 SDV8

SuperV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: West midlands

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by SuperV8 »

Gasket wrote:
Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:53 pm
Megasquirt was my planned route - much like the setup SuperV8 mentions, but interesting to hear that the OEM flywheel triggers might be usable - that's something I'd love to do: keeping it all enclosed. I am using a traditional Milner adaptor plate though - so appreciate that might limit my choice of flywheel (though I do have access to a machine shop and can weld aluminium, so mods are not out of the question).
GEMS/Thor blocks had a hole to mount the crank sensor at the back of the engine to point at the flywheel/flex plate. This location is nice and hidden. Don't know if your 3.5 block has this - or if you could drill a similar hole?

Megasquirt is very flexible in which ever crank signal you choose - as long as there is a missing tooth or two. Most GEMS/Thor were auto which obviously have a flex plate. This has a large riveted trigger wheel - would be nice if this can be fixed to the back of a flywheel? Or if you have a mill - can you mill the teeth in the back on your flywheel? one every 10 degrees for a common 36-1 trigger.
Dax Rush 4.6 supercharged V8 MSII

Gasket
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by Gasket »

Thanks both. That's really helpful.

I've just looked up the location of the sensor above - my block has a witness mark in the same place, so could be machined to accept the sensor - which is great news.

That's great as I'd prefer the idea of the sensor being a little more hidden rather than a pulley-mounted trigger wheel for this application. I was imagining that the sensor would have been part of the Range Rover/Discovery bellhousing rather than being built into the block, so I'll definitely go down that route.

I'm still torn between using separate coil-near-plug drivers for the spark plugs (most likely the LS or VAG units) triggered directly by the aftermarket ECU or sticking with using the Ford EDIS system as an intermediary, which was up until recently the default option. I think (though I'm out of my comfort zone, so happy to be corrected) that most aftermarket ECUs these days (even Megajolt/Megasquirt) can drive these LS/VAG units directly - I mention this as I'm given to understand (and this aligns with SuperV8's advice) that the common 36-1 trigger wheel requirement was specific to the EDIS system and that if using the ECU to fire CNPs that the current crop of ECUs don't mind what format the trigger wheel teeth are - you can just set it accordingly, so I'd be able to use (for example) 60-1.

Chris - my set up is similar to yours: RV8 + Milner adaptor + 9.5" clutch + stumpy R380 + series transfer box. I don't have the space (or need) for a 10.5" clutch either.

So based off all the info so far, it seems like a GEMS 4.0 engine from a manual discovery would give me a lot of the parts I need. I'll update this to include the crank sensor:

Front cover/Water pump/Pulleys/Idler
Possibly the sump (though I'll see if there are any P38 sump styles that better suit the install)
The crankshaft with big main journals
The flywheel including its trigger wheel
The crank position sensor
The camshaft retaining plate
A plethora of small incidental bits


SuperV8, I do have a mill, but if I could simply use a standard Discovery/Gems Manual flywheel drilled to accept a 9.5" clutch and tell the ECU what tooth configuration to expect then I think there's less risk of me messing up on the machining operation (I'm still learning).
Last edited by Gasket on Thu Mar 02, 2023 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

SuperV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: West midlands

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by SuperV8 »

Gasket wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 10:12 am

I'm still torn between using separate coil-near-plug drivers for the spark plugs (most likely the LS or VAG units) triggered directly by the aftermarket ECU or sticking with using the Ford EDIS system as an intermediary, which was up until recently the default option. I think (though I'm out of my comfort zone, so happy to be corrected) that most aftermarket ECUs these days (even Megajolt/Megasquirt) can drive these LS/VAG units directly - I mention this as I'm given to understand (and this aligns with SuperV8's advice) that the common 36-1 trigger wheel requirement was specific to the EDIS system and that if using the ECU to fire CNPs that the current crop of ECUs don't mind what format the trigger wheel teeth are - you can just set it accordingly, so I'd be able to use (for example) 60-1.

SuperV8, I do have a mill, but if I could simply use a standard Discovery/Gems Manual flywheel drilled to accept a 9.5" clutch and tell the ECU what tooth configuration to expect then I think there's less risk of me messing up on the machining operation (I'm still learning).
Absolutely - if you can find a flywheel from a 4.0 that would be great/easiest - but just pointing out that there are options if you can't.

I'm using megasquirt II (MS) and I originally designed it from the older manual to directly/internally trigger my Ford (EDIS/Dumb) coil packs. I used to get issues with MS resetting which is usually due to electrical noise/interference.
The common/preferred way now is to use either smart coils or a coil module+dump coils - so these do the heavy switching of the coils separately to MS and MS only outputs a signal into either of these.

I re-wired my system so my MS has an easy low lever signal output into 2x Bosch coil modules, which triggers my ford coil packs. That change cured my issues - as switching coil packs is a very electrically noisy job.

I would just use what ever 'smart' coils (smart coils include the switching module) you can easily get & fit your engine bay best - along with the custom leads/boots. LS/GM and VAG are common so will have all their parameters easily available.
Dax Rush 4.6 supercharged V8 MSII

Gasket
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by Gasket »

Just a quick question for you both, given your experience in the area.

Just to reiterate, the basic plan is for this to be a carburetted V8 but fitted with a P38A/Disco II distributorless front cover and I would like to use a flywheel mounted OEM toothed wheel and a factory Land Rover position sensor on the back of the engine.

I'll be using an aftermarket ECU to control spark only.

In my head it doesn't matter whether I use a flywheel from a Thor or a GEMS V8 - provided its from a manual vehicle (Disco II or Manual P38) and that I use a matched sensor as I can just tell the ECU what to look for. Is that right?

The only reason I ask is that I'm aware Gems manual flywheels are quite tricky to get and that they are in demand from people sticking with GEMS management during manual installations. So if I can use a Thor engine from a Disco II, it opens up a bit more of choice of donor cars.

Thanks again.

User avatar
ChrisJC
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 5040
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Northants / Cambs
Contact:

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by ChrisJC »

Just be aware that Thor uses a 60-1 trigger pattern, rather than 36-1 like GEMS.

This one is a Thor flywheel (although for reasons that escape me, the trigger feature is at the wrong radius, so I had to move the crank position sensor to detect it. It was also rotationally offset!)
DSC08839.JPG
And this one is a Thor drive gear for a torque converter.
DSC08841.JPG
This one is a GEMS drive plate for a torque converter.
dscf8353.jpg
Chris.
--
Series IIA 4.6 V8
R/R P38 4.6 V8
R/R L405 4.4 SDV8

User avatar
ChrisJC
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 5040
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Northants / Cambs
Contact:

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by ChrisJC »

Also note that the biggest nuisance is getting clearance of oil filter and cooler pipes around the front diff.

On the P38, the diff is on the other side...

Chris.
--
Series IIA 4.6 V8
R/R P38 4.6 V8
R/R L405 4.4 SDV8

SuperV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 947
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:25 pm
Location: West midlands

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by SuperV8 »

Gasket wrote:
Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:55 pm
Just a quick question for you both, given your experience in the area.

Just to reiterate, the basic plan is for this to be a carburetted V8 but fitted with a P38A/Disco II distributorless front cover and I would like to use a flywheel mounted OEM toothed wheel and a factory Land Rover position sensor on the back of the engine.

I'll be using an aftermarket ECU to control spark only.

In my head it doesn't matter whether I use a flywheel from a Thor or a GEMS V8 - provided its from a manual vehicle (Disco II or Manual P38) and that I use a matched sensor as I can just tell the ECU what to look for. Is that right?

The only reason I ask is that I'm aware Gems manual flywheels are quite tricky to get and that they are in demand from people sticking with GEMS management during manual installations. So if I can use a Thor engine from a Disco II, it opens up a bit more of choice of donor cars.

Thanks again.
Yes MS can work with either.
Not sure about other systems.
Dax Rush 4.6 supercharged V8 MSII

Gasket
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 4:32 pm

Re: Crossbolted 3.5 build thread - many questions

Post by Gasket »

thanks both - that's really helpful.

I'll start gathering donor bits to try a few options.

Post Reply

Return to “Engines Area”