Chysler 440 (7.2L) EFI conversion (Jensen Interceptor)

General Chat About Engine Build

Moderator: phpBB2 - Administrators

PhilipL
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:08 pm
Location: Centurion, South Africa

Chysler 440 (7.2L) EFI conversion (Jensen Interceptor)

Post by PhilipL »

Hi All

As to be expected I see there is a lot of Rover V8 activity in this section (which I've had my share of...) so how about something different?

I present here a summary of my EFI conversion of the Chrysler 440 cubic inch (7.2L) engine in my '74 Jensen Interceptor. Pics below.

Summary of the conversion:

1) Edelbrock PRM intake manifold modified to accept injectors;
2) Edelbrock EFI throttle body with TPS and PWM idle valve;
3) Discovery 2 V8 EFI submerged EFI pump;
4) Jaguar XJS surge tank with EFI pump inside;
5) Dual EDIS-8 coil packs with HT wires made by Magnecor;
6) Ignition module consisting of 4 BIP373 transistors, controlled by Megasquirt;
7) EFI control (fuel and spark) by Megasquirt-2 on a V3 board;

I have a downloadable PDF file of the project here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/152 ... 202013.pdf

A very comprehensive thread on this conversion can be found here (I suspect you may have to register to view it): http://www.joc.org.uk/phpBB2/viewtopic. ... 540ed030e2

This is what it looks like after the conversion:
Image

Image


Best regards
Philip

v8250
Getting There
Getting There
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 1:07 pm
Location: West Berkshire

Post by v8250 »

Philip, that's a very interesting conversion. Could imagine the UK Interceptor chaps cringing at non-originality...but good on you for doing this. I have a friend who works for JensenR here in the UK, he took me out in one of the new super Jensen R's some weeks back. These cars are very impressive. I've always had a big 'thing' for 541's and CV8's...they're such great cars and have in mind to convert a 541 to a V8 with manual box in the future. Again, the purists won't like it but a 541-V8 will make a wonderful toy!

PhilipL
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:08 pm
Location: Centurion, South Africa

Post by PhilipL »

v8250 wrote: Again, the purists won't like it
Yep. Well, stuff them. I want to drive and enjoy the car to the max while I have it. And to run a 7.2L at 3000rpm doing 120Km/h will surely kill the earth in less than 20km!!

Besides, everything is bolt on and can be reverted back to original. I kept all the original bits.
Best regards
Philip

DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

Lovely job. ISTR seeing an Interceptor with port injection at the Ace Cafe?
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y

PhilipL
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:08 pm
Location: Centurion, South Africa

Post by PhilipL »

DaveEFI wrote:Lovely job.
Thank you!

This may come as a surprise, but if I were to get another Interceptor (and I hope I do), I would NOT repeat the EFI conversion. I had the car running 99% fine on the Carter carb, compliments of excellent videos on Youtube (starting here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzNhCLg9veg). Only issue that bothered me still l was overfuelling while auto choke was active. The EFI is lovely but the gains are perhaps not worth the cost. The real reason I won't repeat the EFI is about the sound though. I preferred the SOUND the car made with the carb, not that the EFI sound is bad, its just not quite the same and I preferred the carb'ed sound.

I would however again remove the dissy and replace with ECU mapped distributorless ignition and I would again do the 4L60e conversion.
Last edited by PhilipL on Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
Best regards
Philip

User avatar
Eliot
Top Dog
Top Dog
Posts: 1765
Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:46 am
Location: Milton Keynes
Contact:

Post by Eliot »

PhilipL wrote: The EFI is lovely but the gains are perhaps not worth the cost. The .
EFI alone wont give you much of a power increase, mapped ignition probably helps more. But you should find the start, idle and general around town is far better.
Once i had all fuel and ignition under the control the very next upgrade was a pair of Turbos!
Eliot Mansfield
5.7 Dakar 4x4, 4.6 P38 & L322 TDV8
www.mez.co.uk / www.efilive.co.uk

PhilipL
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:08 pm
Location: Centurion, South Africa

Post by PhilipL »

Eliot wrote:EFI alone wont give you much of a power increase, mapped ignition probably helps more.
Quite so! I did not do the EFI conversion for the sake of power but for the sake of refinement and economy.

I first implemented the wasted spark ignition on its own and this brought about a MAJOR improvement in the way the engine behaved over the dual point dissy (with an MS6A)

But, while I was waiting for all the EFI parts to come from the US, I decided to have a go at the carb and that is when I realized that the Carter Thermoquad is actually a very good carb. Once you know its quirks and once it works well it does a very good job. I have a Youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L8iLbZo-Er0) to show how good it was running after I had sorted all its issues and had it tuned well. But I was committed to the EFI conversion and so completed the project.
Best regards
Philip

minorv8
Knows His Stuff
Knows His Stuff
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:10 am

Post by minorv8 »

Excellent reading ! I am currently converting my Rover V8 engine to EFi using factory Efi intake, two Bosch coils (same as factory RR) and Haltech ECU. The plan is to first do the ignition, check that it works with a carb and only then change the fuel part. Of course, all this necessitates moving other components around so there is even more work.

DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

I too did my conversion in stages.

The car (SD1) already had Lucas flapper injection which had never been quite right from new. Mainly a luck of grunt at low revs.

The MegaSquirt 2 fuel only got it running as it should have been from the factory. I then added EDIS later.

Can't say there was a massive difference. Except that it no longer has good and bad days. :D

Next stage is an MS3 and sequential injection. Have all the bits made waiting to be fitted.
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y

Cobratone
Is a Spanner
Posts: 313
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:43 pm
Location: East Mids
Contact:

Post by Cobratone »

DaveEFI wrote:Next stage is an MS3 and sequential injection. Have all the bits made waiting to be fitted.
Me too on my 383 SBC, trying to work out where to put the LS3 coils, don't like them on the rocker covers :D

PhilipL
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:08 pm
Location: Centurion, South Africa

Post by PhilipL »

minorv8 wrote:Excellent reading ! I am currently converting my Rover V8 engine to EFi using factory Efi intake,
If I may make a suggestion:
1) if you want a high revving engine with lots of top end power, use the LUCAS type EFI manifolds with 3.9 or 4.6 cast into the top of the plenum;
2) if you want a low revving engine with lots of low rpm grunt (torque), use the EFI manifold from a Disco2 V8 or P38 Range Rover '99 onwards (THOR engine, Bosch engine management).
Best regards
Philip

DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

If anyone wants a complete top end from a 4.0 Thor, have one here. Or rather think it's everything apart from ECU.

I thought it might look nice on the SD1 - before being told I'd lose out on the top end.
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y

DaveEFI
Gold Member
Gold Member
Posts: 4603
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:27 pm
Location: SW London, UK

Post by DaveEFI »

Cobratone wrote:
DaveEFI wrote:Next stage is an MS3 and sequential injection. Have all the bits made waiting to be fitted.
Me too on my 383 SBC, trying to work out where to put the LS3 coils, don't like them on the rocker covers :D
I'm going to stick with EDIS, since it seems happy enough at the peak revs on my 3.5.

MS3 allows EDIS and sequential injection with the addition of a cam position sensor.
Dave
London SW
Rover SD1 VDP EFI
MegaSquirt2 V3
EDIS8
Tech Edge 2Y

PhilipL
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:08 pm
Location: Centurion, South Africa

Post by PhilipL »

DaveEFI wrote:If anyone wants a complete top end from a 4.0 Thor, have one here. Or rather think it's everything apart from ECU.
Yep, the THOR was designed with low end torque being the objective and basically peters out above 4500rpm.

The Lucas unit only really gets going above 3000rpm.

For a thor EFI to be "complete", you need:
1) The lower and upper efi manifolds with throttle body with all relevant bolts
2) the fuel rail with THOR injectors with bolts;
3) Throttle body with TPS connector and pigtail with bolts as well as the throttle cable mount on the front of the top manifold with 2 bolts;
4) Bosch idle valve with clamps and screws and 2 rubber pipes and connector and pigtail;
5) Both THOR tappet covers with bolts
6) both PCV rubber pipes coming from the tappet covers to the manifold;
7) if you intend using the cabin heater then both THOR heater pipes should also come with along with their bolts;

I have found the the large diameter clean air feed pipe that fits to the throttle body is also useful (for the idle valve clean air) in a custom installation.

Hope I remembered everything...
Best regards
Philip

PhilipL
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2015 4:08 pm
Location: Centurion, South Africa

Post by PhilipL »

DaveEFI wrote:I'm going to stick with EDIS, since it seems happy enough at the peak revs on my 3.5.
Wise. It will be a very special RV8 to test the upper limits of an EDIS-8 ignition system (>7000rpm).

I used dual EDIS-6 ignition systems on my Jaguar V12 implementations. One could use dual EDIS-8 on a 16 cyl engine.

One of my dreams is to Megasquirt a Merlin (terrestrial use). Not that I would find any lying around in South Africa of course....
Best regards
Philip

Post Reply

Return to “Engines Area”