Search found 77 matches
- Fri May 12, 2017 6:53 am
- Forum: Drivetrain & Transmission Area
- Topic: fitting Tremec FORD T5 to RV8
- Replies: 50
- Views: 17628
fitting Tremec FORD T5 to RV8
I have a Dax Rush with a 3.9 RV8 and SD1 LT77 gearbox. I am in the early stages of fitting a new Ford Tremec T5 gearbox (Part N0 1352-000-251). I chose this box because of its slicker gear changing, close 1st to 4th gear ratio and very high 0.63 5th gear for economic cruising. My plan was to marry i...
- Wed May 10, 2017 6:12 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
Just to conclude this post I have now managed to purchase a new Tremec Ford T5 WC gear box with the 0.63 5th gear. Rossco has kindly sold me his 3.14 diff gears so I should be well future proofed for a larger engine. My task now will be to source a TVR bell housing, understand what clutch master and...
- Tue May 09, 2017 4:51 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
- Mon May 08, 2017 7:48 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
OOOO! interesting. The one I am looking at is a V8 Tuner kit called 'New Tremec FORD T5 World Class gearbox kit (competition)' to fit the RV8. I did intend reusing my existing AP Racing triple Green clutch and Ultra light fly wheel to save a bit of cash but from what you are saying that might not be...
- Mon May 08, 2017 4:36 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
The World Class T5 gear box I am considering has taller gears than my SD1 apart from 4th which both share a 1:1 ratio. The 5th gear is quite high at 0.63 which together with my existing 3.62 diff would give me 70 mph @ 2172 rpm. 4th would remain at 122 mph @ 6000 rpm. This I feel would suit my needs...
- Fri May 05, 2017 11:28 am
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
- Fri May 05, 2017 10:01 am
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
Thanks Rossco. This offer is very tempting and may take you up on it. Taking into consideration all the options that need assessing when upgrading to a larger engine I have concluded that I do need a better gear box as I'm not happy with my present LT77 ponderous gear changing. I have written to V8t...
- Fri May 05, 2017 7:18 am
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
- Thu May 04, 2017 6:22 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
Apologies Side car, yes you did say that standard jest would need modifying. I made a tentative enquiry into having my diff gears changed. Apparently new 3.1 gears are now hard to come by. A 3.3 would save me 250 rpm @ 70 mph and 225 x 40 x17 rear wheels and tyres another another 150. I first though...
- Wed May 03, 2017 7:21 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
Cam gear reset to standard timing and now back on the road. Confirmed that 70 mph equates to 2800 RPM. Side Car, are the 61/55 jets you suggested an off the shelf item? Do you know of a uk supplier who might hold a comprehensive stock of Edelbrock metering rods? Tom (Super V8). Many thanks for the s...
- Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:04 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
Good point. Unfortunately I just had the diff completely refurbished last year including new gears. An opportunity missed perhaps. I believe the viscous LSD diff was originally from a Sierra Cosworth which would fall in line with your assessment. It does however make for a very lively car even at 70...
- Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:30 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
Many thanks for working out the % rod / jet settings and will test out your suggestion below if no joy from my cam timing investigation. (Your current setup (83 -65/57) is 15% and 22% leaner than base, you need to be even leaner than 22% on the power step. 80 - 61/55 is 15% 28% 80 - 61/57 is 15% 32% )
- Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:22 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
I am half way through dismantling the front of the car at present to get at the timing cover. I just want to check that I haven't done something stupid like a tooth out. I will reassemble with '0' (factory setting) on the timing sprocket. It does seem strange that my carb settings are so weak yet ru...
- Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:23 am
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
- Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:15 pm
- Forum: Engines Area
- Topic: 3.9 vs Bigger engines
- Replies: 44
- Views: 14599
Thanks for the very comprehensive advice. So as suggested I inhibited the secondary throttle bodies and went for a test run. Cruise vacuum was approx. 12”hg with an AFR between 14.5 and 15.5. I’m happy with that and assume Vac is within expected parameters? With a reasonable brisk acceleration vacuu...