Legalities of buying 2nd hand cars? Serious issue.
Posted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:47 pm
Hmph, something came up today regarding the MR2 and I'd like some advice if possible.
When i bought the car, the man didn't have the V5, so gave me a cheque for £25 to cover a new one. No issues there. The tax was just about to run out as well, but it wasn't until after I bought the car and got it home that I found out it takes 6 weeks to get a new V5. The car also needed an MOT, which I was fine with as he had the recent fail sheet and it just 'needed the handbrake adjusting' according to him - it actually needed a complete refurb and cost me £35 (so £75 inc. the MOT).
When I bought the car, I was assured it was mechanically and electrically sound. When I went to collect the car, I only drove it for a short distance and noticed the clutch slipping. I mentioned this to the previous owner (he was in the car, I was giving him a lift home) and he assured me it was a 'glazed clutch' and that it had happened 'once before about 6 months ago'. Now, i'm not a dummy when it comes to cars, and neither is he (he just finished automotive engineering at uni).
So I went along with it, it drove home ok but the next morning I noticed it really bad. So unfortunately I had to get a new clutch sorted out, which cost me £240. Now as far as I am concerned, the sale of the car was misrepresented, as the car wasn't mechanically sound and he also failed to mention the clutch problem until I'd paid him.
So I phoned the previous owner about the clutch, and also mentioned the taxing issue. Cut a long story short, we agreed a deal where he paid for 6 months tax and would send the disc up to me, and we call it quits, everybody happy. Well he did that, and also cancelled the £25 cheque for the V5, as I have just received the letter from the bank.
Now that's just bloody cheeky! He obviously wasn't happy about paying for the tax, but considering the cost of the clutch I think he got off lightly.
Personally, I think he knew there was a problem with the clutch and tried to pass it on quietly, when I came back at him (nicely) about it, he did try to wriggle out of it a few times, but after mentioning misrepresentation etc we came to a deal that I was (reluctantly) happy with.
Anyway, the point is, where do I stand now, because I think, from what I know, that I can take him to court for breach of contract and misrepresentation? All I want is the money for the V5 and the clutch.
advice?
When i bought the car, the man didn't have the V5, so gave me a cheque for £25 to cover a new one. No issues there. The tax was just about to run out as well, but it wasn't until after I bought the car and got it home that I found out it takes 6 weeks to get a new V5. The car also needed an MOT, which I was fine with as he had the recent fail sheet and it just 'needed the handbrake adjusting' according to him - it actually needed a complete refurb and cost me £35 (so £75 inc. the MOT).
When I bought the car, I was assured it was mechanically and electrically sound. When I went to collect the car, I only drove it for a short distance and noticed the clutch slipping. I mentioned this to the previous owner (he was in the car, I was giving him a lift home) and he assured me it was a 'glazed clutch' and that it had happened 'once before about 6 months ago'. Now, i'm not a dummy when it comes to cars, and neither is he (he just finished automotive engineering at uni).
So I went along with it, it drove home ok but the next morning I noticed it really bad. So unfortunately I had to get a new clutch sorted out, which cost me £240. Now as far as I am concerned, the sale of the car was misrepresented, as the car wasn't mechanically sound and he also failed to mention the clutch problem until I'd paid him.
So I phoned the previous owner about the clutch, and also mentioned the taxing issue. Cut a long story short, we agreed a deal where he paid for 6 months tax and would send the disc up to me, and we call it quits, everybody happy. Well he did that, and also cancelled the £25 cheque for the V5, as I have just received the letter from the bank.
Now that's just bloody cheeky! He obviously wasn't happy about paying for the tax, but considering the cost of the clutch I think he got off lightly.
Personally, I think he knew there was a problem with the clutch and tried to pass it on quietly, when I came back at him (nicely) about it, he did try to wriggle out of it a few times, but after mentioning misrepresentation etc we came to a deal that I was (reluctantly) happy with.
Anyway, the point is, where do I stand now, because I think, from what I know, that I can take him to court for breach of contract and misrepresentation? All I want is the money for the V5 and the clutch.
advice?