Page 1 of 1
Would a Chev Manifold fit a RV8?
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:42 pm
by Ian Anderson
As per title
I have seen a Chev manifold with a set of 4 Webber IDF's that would be great for the GT40
Can that manifold fit a 3.9 RV8?
If not anyone got a Chevvy and want some Bling carbs?
Ian
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 5:52 pm
by Lewis
I can't help you on that one - but you could always get a quad inlet fannymold for the RV8 and transfer the carbs across, then sell any Chev specific bits? Maybe something worth considering

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:05 pm
by Eliot
Take a browse through my growing rover v8 manifold archive for some ideas:
http://www.mez.co.uk/ms12.html
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:14 pm
by Lewis
Ey Eliot, sorry to go off-topic for one sec, just wanted to see if you'd checked the last page on the "Twin plenum" thread - posted up a pic of the "trouser" manifold.
I can send you a copy without the logo in the corner if you like for your library

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 6:18 pm
by katanaman
manifold wont fit and the carbs might be a touch too big for your engine but I don't know what size IDF's they are. Apart from that you think you have problems just now with your efi wait till you try and tune quad carbs.
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:10 pm
by kev_the_mole
Ian,
was this the one you were looking at ?
Pete Farmer has a 3.5 RV8 Healey which had 4 x 48 IDA's (below) which gave him so much trouble that he went back to a 4-barrel
Cheers
Ian
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:17 pm
by Ian Anderson
Ian
This is what I saw
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/IDF-48-W ... dZViewItem
I accept there is a set up routine with these but certainly are a bit more period correct on a GT40 than EFi
Ian
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:34 pm
by ian.stewart
I have seen RV8 webber set ups going for less than £600 recently, I would cost a fortune to set up 48s for a RV8, they are too big for general road use, even for a 5 litre it would be a bit big, and probably need 7k rev limit to get the best from them, I have 42mm Jenvies on my 3.9 Cortina which in reality are posibly a bit on the large size for TBs
Lack of air speed over bleed holes would give you no end of problems getting the engine to run at low speeds with 48s,and to get the air speed up, to run the carbs you probably need a tickover of 2k+ to get any sort of throttle response.
Ian
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:54 am
by pitsnow
I have a set of 44IDF on a 4.6 engine.
They are working fine without the progression problems a lot of people encounter with the downdraughts.
The key is to have the right size carburettor (as always) with the right parts inside.
It took a bid of asking around and testing but as I said, mine are working.
I ended with: F7 emulsion tubes, 140 main, 180 air and 0.60 idle.
That will be different for any other engine.
The main point was the change to the F7 emulsion tubes that has given the better progression for my engine.
As a lot of people said to me, why not go EFI with throttle bodies?
It will take away all the mess with the jets and most of the set-up.

Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 11:58 am
by Ian Anderson
Pitsnow
That looks really good! and the correct effect for the GT40
So the 48 will be a bit big - oh well with the USD rate at the moment they looked like a bargain!
cheers
Ian
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 12:32 pm
by pitsnow
If you want carbs, why not have a stab at those:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? ... &rd=1&rd=1
You can get the manifold seperate.
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:23 pm
by JSF55
Those split manifolda are still available i believe, the proper cast manifolds were made by janspeed and it was believed there was only 6 cast, the last count accounted for 5 of them, so there's another out there somewhere, most people found them very difficult to set up and to big for the rover at 48, 45's would have just about be acceptable, my mate has a set and although he enjoys the performance of them, the 12 to the gallon on a run was unaccepltable !! john
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:12 pm
by ian.stewart
Mangolesti certainly made RV8 Rover manifolds, and are still listed on some sites I have looked at today.
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:22 pm
by Wotland