Page 1 of 2

are 2007 manifolds soutable for older V8's?

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:17 pm
by Ralphh85
im gonna have to do something to bring my exhausts along the exhaust ports then down amnd under the car due to room isues, would these fit older 3.5 engines?

they are very ugly but might do the trick?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Stainless-Steel-R ... 286.c0.m14

else it hink i will have to make some, or maybe use the older 101 exhausts.


Ralph

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 4:30 pm
by chodjinn
they dont look like RV8 manifolds to me - flange holes are in the wrong orientation aren't they? More like the BMW ones?

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 5:51 pm
by Ralphh85
they look wrong for my V8 yes, but i thought they could swivel maybe??

Ralph

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 6:05 pm
by CastleMGBV8
Definitely not for the original Rover engine they are probably for the 4.2L Jaguar V8 engined version.

Kevin.

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 9:13 pm
by chodjinn
if you're stuck for space you could try some MGB V8 manifolds, they hug the block pretty tight and I think are better than the standard Rover ones.

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:03 pm
by Ralphh85
do they go along all the ports? i want mine to go along before goign down as if the back goes straight down the middle it will hit the subframe.

any pics by any chance?


Ralph

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 10:12 pm
by ian.stewart
there are a set of cast manifolds that come out the back, but I cant remember which ones they are, P6??
What about these, http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Range-Rover-P38-4 ... 286.c0.m14

Late model 4.6 rangie stainless manifolds.

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:08 pm
by HairbearTE
I've probably got a pair of rear exiting manifolds somewhere. I think there were single and twin pipe rear exit manifolds offered at one time or another, which do you need?

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:37 pm
by HairbearTE

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 6:40 am
by v8man
ones on top look BMW

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:14 am
by ChrisJC
HairbearTE wrote:http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/REAR-OUTLET-EXHAU ... 286.c0.m14


These look ideal..
They are 101 exhausts. (so they are OK).

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 9:42 am
by Ralphh85
101 exhausts may well be the way forward.

will have to check engine/subframe an might have a bid on they!

cheers.

Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 4:25 pm
by 101v8
Ralphh85 wrote:101 exhausts may well be the way forward.

will have to check engine/subframe an might have a bid on they!

cheers.
101 exhaust manifolds have a nasty habit of cracking, so i'd check first to make sure they haven't. Also the right hand (IIRC) manifolds are getting very rare these days and can go for big money.

william

101 exhausts

Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:41 am
by Ralphh85
where do they crack?

i have 1 already which i picked up from a mates last night, its the left hand side one (drivers side).

im not sure if he has any more as he wasnt there an was only one i could find.


Ralph

edit, i will probly replace them with tubular stainless ones once ont he road anyway so as long as they are ok for a bit it will be fine, if they crack in a year it doesnt matter.

also they are a prettty bad performance design, will they reduce power at all? or are they no worse than rangy ones etc?

Re: 101 exhausts

Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 12:37 pm
by 101v8
Ralphh85 wrote:where do they crack?
Mine had a verticle crack on the engine side ~half way along. I didn't see it until i had the engine stripped for a rebuild.
Apparantly they tend to crack because when Land Rover produced them they didn't let them weather for any length of time before they were machined flat. Also, they were attached without any gaskets which probably didn't help either.
Ralphh85 wrote: also they are a prettty bad performance design, will they reduce power at all? or are they no worse than rangy ones etc?
101 definitely weren't built for performance! I think the Range rover P38 exhaust manifolds would be better (and usually cheaper). unfortunately for me, they foul on the 101 chassis.