Stick with EFi or Go to Carb?
Posted: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:06 pm
Ok usual stuff
GT40 replica Total on full tanks at SVA 1100kg.
Rover3.9 worked by JE Motors, 102 cam, biggest valves possible, full cross over exhaust running on hotwire efi, with a choice of 2 ECU packs. Standard gives more reasonable driving at low speeds and the "worked" one gives more power higher up.
Problem has always been that at town speeds the car kangaroos as the 30 - 40 mph stuff puts the engine in the 14 - 1700 rev range and it is not happy at that rev range - it seems to me that the unit decided to fuel - then the ecu says too much , turns the fuel off and so starts the kangaroo.
So I can get by for a short while by leaving in 1st or 2nd and running at over 2000 rpm but tend to heat up.
So question is, if I take the EFi stuff off and go for a Webber 500 will the "old technology" not prove as effective in trying to "sort itself out" and result in a smoother ride?
Also carb fed would also make the car look more period correct.
Comments etc. most welcome
Ian
GT40 replica Total on full tanks at SVA 1100kg.
Rover3.9 worked by JE Motors, 102 cam, biggest valves possible, full cross over exhaust running on hotwire efi, with a choice of 2 ECU packs. Standard gives more reasonable driving at low speeds and the "worked" one gives more power higher up.
Problem has always been that at town speeds the car kangaroos as the 30 - 40 mph stuff puts the engine in the 14 - 1700 rev range and it is not happy at that rev range - it seems to me that the unit decided to fuel - then the ecu says too much , turns the fuel off and so starts the kangaroo.
So I can get by for a short while by leaving in 1st or 2nd and running at over 2000 rpm but tend to heat up.
So question is, if I take the EFi stuff off and go for a Webber 500 will the "old technology" not prove as effective in trying to "sort itself out" and result in a smoother ride?
Also carb fed would also make the car look more period correct.
Comments etc. most welcome
Ian