Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 9:55 am
Nice
they look the business
decent chamber shape
casting and finnish look good
Mike
they look the business
decent chamber shape
casting and finnish look good
Mike
The V8 Owners Forum -
Welcome to the well-known V8 Owners Forum, no matter what you drive if its V8 Powered you'll be made very welcome.
https://www.v8forum.co.uk/forum/
Dilemna
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 6:52 pm
Yeah the chambers are an improvement but I am most impressed that the valves appear to be much closer to the bore centerline. This is no mean feat considering they use the standard rocker gear arrangement (albeit with some re-enforcement at the shaft ends, right where it is needed) . I expect this is the main reason for developement taking longer than intended and also for the unique valve covers. I guess this will change the angle of the pushrods slightly but presumably this was found to be acceptable in testing. I hope they sell like hot cakes and stay in production, Real Steel deserve it for the effort they've put in and its a boost for the old rover lump too. What they need now is some success on the track.
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 7:20 pm
If I win the lottery, I'll be straight over to order some 
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 7:35 pm
Pics of them on my spare block.
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 7:49 pm
Get that grubby old manifold off there 
I hadn't actually noticed that the sided of the head weren't built up so the covers lay flattish.
I hadn't actually noticed that the sided of the head weren't built up so the covers lay flattish.Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 8:08 pm
A bit poo isn't it. This is gonna look silly with a rover style plenum on it isn't it. . . . .
If i'm lucky i may get my itb's back and have another bash at those with these heads.
If i'm lucky i may get my itb's back and have another bash at those with these heads.
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 5:03 pm
Funny isn't it? RS go to enormous lengths to make a performance head that can still be used with all the rover pieces and then we all come along and say stock parts loook out of place on it! I must say the valve covers look much better now they are on the engine. It looks much more modern, less like a 50's nailhead buick! The only downside I can see is that you can no longor put your cup of tea down on the rocker cover when working under the bonnet!
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 11:22 am
Personally I like the rocker covers!
They certainly look better than some I've seen.
Does anyone know the reason for the filled in corner on the inlet ports?
Also, it's been mentioned that the exhaust ports are slightly raised.
How much is 'slightly'?
They certainly look better than some I've seen.
Does anyone know the reason for the filled in corner on the inlet ports?
Also, it's been mentioned that the exhaust ports are slightly raised.
How much is 'slightly'?
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:05 pm
1/4 of an inch higher. Don't know about the corner on the ports.
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 11:37 am
Number two arived.............. 
Just bought the 31 cc ones for my 3.5.
According to RS they will work on a 3.5 with a supercharger. Lucky me..... we run a 3.5 supercharged.......
By RS calculations the 31 cc using composite gaskeds will give a compressionratio of 9.02:1 on our 3.5.
Thinking of buying their Blowercam too
Just bought the 31 cc ones for my 3.5.
According to RS they will work on a 3.5 with a supercharger. Lucky me..... we run a 3.5 supercharged.......
By RS calculations the 31 cc using composite gaskeds will give a compressionratio of 9.02:1 on our 3.5.
Thinking of buying their Blowercam too